Norse v. State of California Department of Motor Vehicles

Filing 3

ORDER denying plaintiff's 2 Motion to Proceed IFP, signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 8/24/15. Within 28 days of this order, plaintiff shall pay the applicable filing fee. However, the court will entertain a request for a reasonable extension of time to pay the fee should such an extension be necessary. Failure to timely pay the filing fee, or timely request an extension of time to do so, may result in a recommendation of dismissal of the action. (Kastilahn, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

MABEL NORSE,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14
15

No. 2:15-cv-1358-JAM-KJN PS

v.

ORDER

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES,

16

Defendant.

17
Presently pending before the court is plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed without the

18
19

prepayment of fees and costs, also referred to as in forma pauperis, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §

20

1915.1 (ECF No. 2.) The affidavit in support of the motion states that plaintiff receives monthy

21

net income of $3,638.01. (Id.) Plaintiff has no dependents. (Id.)
Presently, a filing fee of $400.00 is required to commence a civil action in this court. The

22
23

court may authorize the commencement of an action “without prepayment of fees or security

24

therefor” by a person that is unable to pay such fees or provide security therefor. 28 U.S.C. §

25

1915(a)(1). Here, the court cannot find that plaintiff is unable to pay the court filing fee, because

26

her annual income of $43,656.12 is well over 300% of the 2015 federal poverty guideline. See

27

1

This case was referred to the undersigned pursuant to E.D. Cal. L.R. 302(c)(21).

28
1

1
2

http://aspe.hhs.gov/2015-poverty-guidelines.
The court is sympathetic to the fact that plaintiff does not earn a vast amount of annual

3

income and that plaintiff also has several expenses with which to contend. However, numerous

4

litigants in this court have significant monthly expenditures and sometimes face difficult choices

5

as to which expenses to incur, which expenses to reduce or eliminate, and how to apportion their

6

income between such expenses and litigating an action in federal court. Such difficulties in

7

themselves do not amount to indigence.

8

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

9

1.

10

Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2) is denied.

2. Within 28 days of this order, plaintiff shall pay the applicable filing fee. However, the

11

court will entertain a request for a reasonable extension of time to pay the fee should

12

such an extension be necessary.

13

3. Failure to timely pay the filing fee, or timely request an extension of time to do so,

14

may result in a recommendation of dismissal of the action pursuant to Federal Rule of

15

Civil Procedure 41(b).

16
17

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: August 24, 2015

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2