Pelling v. Amtrak et al

Filing 24

STIPULATED ORDER FOR DISMISSAL signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 1/3/18. The Court accordingly DISMISSES Plaintiff Leslie Pelling's Civil Complaint in United States District Court, Case Number 2:15-CV-01378- MCE-KJN against De fendant City of Sacramento, with prejudice. Plaintiff Leslie Pelling and Defendant City of Sacramento each shall waive and bear their own costs, expenses, and attorneys fees with respect to any claims they have or had against each other. CASE CLOSED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 Matthew D. Ruyak, Interim City Attorney, (SBN 184772) KATHERINE E. UNDERWOOD, Deputy City Attorney II (SBN 249308) KUnderwood2@cityofsacramento.org CITY OF SACRAMENTO 915 I Street, Room 4010 Sacramento, CA 95814-2608 Telephone: (916) 808-5346 Telecopier: (916) 808-7455 Attorneys for the CITY OF SACRAMENTO 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 Case No.: 2:15-cv-01378-MCE-KJN LESLIE PELLING, ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATED MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT AGAINST THE CITY OF SACRAMENTO, WITH PREJUDICE, PURSUANT TO FRCP RULE 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) Plaintiff, vs. AMTRAK, INC; and CITY OF SACRAMENTO, 16 Defendants. 17 18 THE COURT, having reviewed and approved the Joint Stipulated Motion to 19 Dismiss Plaintiff Leslie Pelling’s Complaint against Defendant City of Sacramento, with 20 prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), orders as 21 follows: IT IS ORDERED THAT the Joint Stipulated Motion to Dismiss is (ECF No. 123 22 23 approved. 24 The Court accordingly dismisses Plaintiff Leslie Pelling’s Civil Complaint in United 25 States District Court, Case Number 2:15-CV-01378-MCE-KJN against Defendant City of 26 Sacramento, with prejudice. Plaintiff Leslie Pelling and Defendant City of Sacramento each 27 /// 28 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATED MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT AGAINST THE CITY OF SACRAMENTO 685114 1 shall waive and bear their own costs, expenses, and attorney’s fees with respect to any claims 2 they have or had against each other. IT IS SO ORDERED: 3 4 Dated: January 3, 2018 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATED MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT AGAINST THE CITY OF SACRAMENTO 685114

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?