Smith v. Deuel Vocational Institute et al
Filing
11
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 10/11/2016 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice; Referred to District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller; Objections due within 21 days after being served with these F & R's. (Reader, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
KENNETH ARDELL SMITH,
12
13
14
15
16
No. 2:15-cv-1380 KJM AC P
Plaintiff,
v.
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
DEUEL VOCATIONAL INSTITUTE et
al.,
Defendants.
17
18
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with an action filed
19
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. By order dated June 15, 2016, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed
20
and thirty days leave to amend was granted. ECF No. 8. Plaintiff was warned that failure to file
21
an amended complaint would result in dismissal of this action. Id. at 8. To date, plaintiff has not
22
filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order.
23
24
25
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without
prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge
26
assigned to this case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty one days
27
after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections
28
with the court. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings
1
1
and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified
2
time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153
3
(9th Cir. 1991).
4
DATED: October 11, 2016
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?