Carter v. Solano County Sheriff's Office et al

Filing 9

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 4/5/16 ORDERING that this action be DISMISSED without prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Dillon, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

DANIEL MAURICE CARTER,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14
15

No. 2:15-cv-1381 KJN P

v.

ORDER

SOLANO COUNTY SHERIFF’S
OFFICE, et al.,
Defendants.

16
17

Plaintiff consented to proceed before the undersigned for all purposes. See 28 U.S.C.

18
19

§ 636(c). By order filed November 17, 2015, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days

20

leave to file an amended complaint was granted. The thirty day period has now expired, and

21

plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order.
Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the order was returned, plaintiff

22
23

was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current

24

address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record address of

25

the party is fully effective.

26

////

27

////

28

////
1

1

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local

2

Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

3

Dated: April 5, 2016

4
5
6
7
/cart1381.fta.nca

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2