Paige v. People of the State of California

Filing 11

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 5/2/16 ORDERING that the court takes no action on petitioners 10 IFP filing as this case is now closed. Petitioner is hereby informed that the court will not respond to future filings in this action that are not authorized by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.(Dillon, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

TIMOTHY WAYNE PAIGE,

12
13
14
15
16

No. 2:15-cv-1399-TLN-EFB P

Petitioner,
v.

ORDER

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA,
Respondent.

17
18

On September 24, 2015, findings and recommendations were filed recommending that this

19

action be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. On December 8, 2015, the assigned

20

district judge adopted that recommendation and dismissed this action. Judgment was entered

21

accordingly. Notwithstanding that judgment closing this case, petitioner filed on February 23,

22

2016, a request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis.

23

The court takes no action on petitioner’s filing as this case is now closed. Petitioner is

24

hereby informed that the court will not respond to future filings in this action that are not

25

authorized by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.

26
27
28

So ordered.
Dated: May 2, 2016.