Mar v. Genuine Parts Company et al
Filing
26
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 03/29/16 ORDERING that plaintiff is GRANTED LEAVE to file a First Amended Complaint, and defendant's deadline to answer the First Amended Complaint is due 30 days after the date of the Court's ruling on the parties' anticipated request for settlement approval. (Benson, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
BRYAN SCHWARTZ LAW
Bryan J. Schwartz (SBN 209903)
Email: bryan@bryanschwartzlaw.com
Yi-Fan C. Everett (SBN 301815)
Email: yvonne@bryanschwartzlaw.com
1330 Broadway, Suite 1630
Oakland, CA 94612
Telephone: (510) 444-9300
Facsimile: (510) 444-9301
Attorneys for Individual and Representative
Plaintiff and the Collective Class
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
12
Sean Mar, individually, on behalf of others
similarly situated, and on behalf of the general
public,
Case No.: 2:15-cv-01405-MCE-AC
Judge: Hon. Morrison C. England, Jr.
13
Plaintiff,
14
15
vs.
STIPULATION FOR LEAVE FOR
PLAINTIFF TO FILE FIRST AMENDED
COMPLAINT AND ORDER THEREON
16
17
Genuine Parts Company, NAPA AUTO PARTS, Complaint Filed: July 1, 2015
and DOES 1-10, inclusive
18
19
Defendants.
20
21
Subsequent to the filing of this lawsuit and for settlement purposes only, Plaintiff,
22
on behalf of himself and all other similarly situated individuals, asserts an additional
23
cause of action, civil penalties pursuant to Labor Code Private Attorneys General Act of
24
2004 (PAGA) (Cal. Labor Code § 2698, et seq.), and an additional cause of action for
25
waiting time penalties (Cal. Labor Code § 203). Moreover, for settlement purposes only,
26
Plaintiff has agreed to eliminate his California class claims because of Defendant
27
28
1
STIPULATION FOR LEAVE FOR PLAINITFF TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
AND ORDER THEREON (CASE NO.: 2:15-cv-01405-MCE-AC)
1
Genuine Parts Company d/b/a NAPA Auto Parts’ (hereinafter “Defendant”) challenge
2
based upon the numerosity requirement of Rule 23.
3
Therefore, Plaintiff, on behalf of himself and all other similarly situated individuals,
4
and Defendant, by and through their attorneys of record, hereby stipulate and agree that
5
the Court should grant Plaintiff leave to file the attached First Amended Complaint in this
6
lawsuit (attached hereto as Exhibit 1) and the First Amended Complaint shall be deemed
7
served and filed on the date this Stipulation and Order is filed.
8
9
10
11
The parties further agree that the Defendant’s deadline to answer the Complaint
be continued to a date 30 days after the date of the Court’s ruling on the parties’
anticipated soon-to-be-filed request for settlement approval.
By this stipulation, Defendant does not admit liability or otherwise waive its right to
12
challenge the content of the First Amended Complaint. Moreover, to the extent that the
13
Court does not approve the settlement of this lawsuit, then this stipulated Amended
14
Complaint will be withdrawn.
15
16
17
DATED: March 21, 2016
BRYAN SCHWARTZ LAW
By:_s/Bryan Schwartz_________
Bryan Schwartz
Yi-Fan C. Everett
18
19
20
Attorneys for Plaintiff and the Putative Class
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Dated: March 21, 2016
MARTENSON, HASBROUCK & SIMON LLP
By:_s/Lisa Szafranic________
Patricia Elizabeth Simon
Lisa M. Szafranic
Attorneys for Defendant
2
STIPULATION FOR LEAVE FOR PLAINITFF TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
AND ORDER THEREON (CASE NO.: 2:15-cv-01405-MCE-AC)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
ORDER
For good cause shown and based upon the stipulation of the parties, the Court
hereby orders that Plaintiff is granted leave to file a First Amended Complaint, and
Defendant’s deadline to answer the First Amended Complaint does not become due until
30 days after the date of the Court’s ruling on the parties’ anticipated request for
settlement approval.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 29, 2016
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION FOR LEAVE FOR PLAINITFF TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
AND ORDER THEREON (CASE NO.: 2:15-cv-01405-MCE-AC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?