Martin v. Butte

Filing 19

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 3/22/17 ORDERING that the hearing on 15 Motion for Summary Judgment is CONTINUED to 5/4/2017 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2 (TLN) before District Judge Troy L. Nunley. Plaintiff's opposition due on 4/20/17, and defendant's reply due on 4/27/2017. (Kastilahn, A)

1
2
3
4
5

A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
Stephen E. Horan, SBN 125241
William E. Camy, SBN 291397
350 University Avenue, Suite 200
Sacramento, California 95825
TEL: [phone] • FAX: [phone]

8

Bruce S. Alpert, SBN 75684
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY COUNSEL
COUNTY OF BUTTE
25 County Center Drive, Suite 201
Oroville, CA 95965
TEL: [phone] • FAX: [phone]

9

Attorneys for Defendant, COUNTY OF BUTTE

6
7

10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11

PORTER | SCOTT

350 University Ave., Suite 200
Sacramento, CA 95825
TEL: [phone]
FAX: [phone]

12
13

KARA JOLIE MARTIN,

CASE NO.: 2:15-CV-01409-TLN-CMK

14
Plaintiff,
15
16
17
18
19

v.
COUNTY OF BUTTE, and
Does 1-15,
Defendants.

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
CONTINUE MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT HEARING AND RELATED
DATES
Date: April 6, 2017
Time: 2:00 p.m.
Courtroom: 2
Judge: Tory L. Nunley

20
21

___________________________________/

Complaint Filed: 07/02/15

22

This Stipulation is entered into by and between Plaintiff KARA JOLIE MARTIN

23

(“Plaintiff”) and Defendant COUNTY OF BUTTE (“County”) through counsel of record. The

24

Parties have conferred and agree to continue the Motion for Summary Judgment hearing currently

25

scheduled for April 6, 2017, at 2:00 p.m., to May 4, 2017, at 2:00 p.m. The parties agree that

26

Plaintiff’s Opposition and Defendant’s Reply should be scheduled in accordance with the new

27

hearing date. Thus, Plaintiff’s Opposition would be due April 20, 2017, and Defendant’s Reply

28

would be due on April 27, 2017. The parties agree a continuance is necessary considering
1
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT HEARING DATE
AND RELATED DATES

1

Plaintiff’s counsel has indicated he has an unavoidable conflict with the original hearing date. The

2

new hearing date complies with the Court’s Pretrial Scheduling Order.

3

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

4
5

DATED: March 22, 2017

LAW OFFICES OF MELO AND SARSFIELD LLP

6
7

By

/s/ John Sarsfield (authorized 03/21/17)
Marguerite Melo
John Sarsfield
Attorneys for Plaintiff
KARA JOLIE MARTIN

8
9
10
11

PORTER | SCOTT

350 University Ave., Suite 200
Sacramento, CA 95825
TEL: [phone]
FAX: [phone]

12
13

DATED: March 22, 2017

PORTER SCOTT
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION

14
15

By

16
17

/s/ Stephen E. Horan
Stephen E. Horan
William E. Camy
Attorneys for Defendant
COUNTY OF BUTTE

18
19

ORDER

20
21

IT IS SO ORDERED.

22
23

Date: March 22, 2017

24
25

Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge

26
27
28
2
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT HEARING DATE
AND RELATED DATES