Johnson v. Ramirez et al
Filing
10
ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 1/7/16 ORDERING counsel for both parties to show casue, within seven days of entry of this order, why they should not be sanctioned in the amount of $250 for failure to comply with this court's order to file a joint status report. Counsel for both parties are to file, within seven days of entry of this order, a joint status report advising the court whether they have reached settlement or exhausted their efforts to settle. (Kastilahn, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JOHNSON,
No. 2:15-cv-01442-KJM-EFB
12
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
RAMIREZ et al.,
15
ORDER
Defendants.
16
17
On August 12, 2015, the court issued a minute order directing the parties to
18
19
promptly meet and confer to discuss settlement for this action. ECF No. 8. Within 60 days of
20
this minute order, the parties were required to file a joint status report advising the court whether
21
they have reached settlement or exhausted efforts to settle. Id. The parties have not filed a joint
22
status report.
23
Accordingly, counsel for both parties are hereby ORDERED, within seven (7)
24
days of entry of this order, to show cause why they should not be sanctioned in the amount of
25
$250 for failure to comply with this court’s order to file a joint status report.
26
Additionally, counsel for both parties are hereby ORDERED, within (7) days of
27
entry of this order, to file a joint status report advising the court whether they have reached
28
settlement or exhausted their efforts to settle.
1
1
2
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: January 7, 2016.
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?