Ahmed v. Duffy et al

Filing 33

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 7/10/2017 ORDERING the Deputy AG representing sole defendant Johnson shall contact the litigation coordinator at CSP-LAC and, within 10 days, file and serve a statement that responds to plaintiff's allegations, identifies any adverse impacts to plaintiff resulting from his participation in the settlement conference in this case, and specifies how and when CSP-LAC officials intend to resolve any continuing adverse impacts.(Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SAIYEZ AHMED, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:15-cv-1470 JAM AC P v. ORDER BRIAN DUFFY, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff has filed a “report of retaliation” that recounts the adverse impacts of 17 18 participating in an unsuccessful settlement conference before this court on June 9, 2017, which 19 required, inter alia, transportation and temporary placement at other institutions. The alleged 20 adverse impacts include plaintiff’s prolonged and continuing placement in administrative 21 segregation, loss of a prison job and compensation, and postponement of medical treatment. See 22 ECF No. 32. The Deputy Attorney General representing sole defendant Johnson is directed to contact 23 24 the litigation coordinator at California State Prison, Los Angeles County (CSP-LAC) and, within 25 ten days after the filing date of this order, to file and serve a statement that responds to plaintiff’s 26 allegations, identifies any adverse impacts to plaintiff resulting from his participation in the 27 //// 28 //// 1 1 settlement conference in this case, and specifies how and when CSP-LAC officials intend to 2 resolve any continuing adverse impacts. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: July 10, 2017 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?