Ahmed v. Duffy et al

Filing 41

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 8/16/2017 DENYING plaintiff's 40 "Motion for Court's Consideration in Prosecution for Perjury for Declarant D. Sanchez". (Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SAIYEZ AHMED, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:15-cv-1470 AC P v. ORDER BRIAN DUFFY, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 On August 6, 2017, plaintiff prepared and submitted the pending motion for sanctions 17 18 against D. Sanchez, the Litigation Coordinator at California State Prison Corcoran (ECF No. 40). 19 In this motion, plaintiff contends there are factual inaccuracies in Sanchez’ original declaration 20 (ECF No. 34-1), which was filed in response to the court’s July 10, 2017 order to show cause 21 (ECF No. 33). This contention mirrors plaintiff’s previously-filed objections (ECF No. 37) to the 22 court’s order discharging the order to show cause (ECF No. 35). Following submission of 23 plaintiff’s objections, Sanchez filed a supplemental declaration (ECF No. 38-1) explaining and 24 correcting the inaccuracies in his original declaration. Accordingly, on August 14, 2017, the 25 court overruled plaintiff’s objections (ECF No. 37) to the order discharging the order to show 26 cause (ECF No. 39). 27 //// 28 //// 1 1 Plaintiff’s presently pending motion, prepared prior to service of Sanchez’ supplemental 2 declaration and the court’s subsequent order, provides no new grounds for revisiting this matter. 3 Plaintiff is admonished to refrain from filing further documents in this case until after the district 4 judge’s consideration of the undersigned’s findings and recommendations concerning 5 administrative exhaustion (ECF No. 31). 6 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s “Motion for Court’s 7 Consideration in Prosecution for Perjury for Declarant D. Sanchez” (ECF No. 40) is DENIED. 8 DATED: August 16, 2017 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?