Parks v. Rolfing et al

Filing 102

ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 10/03/18 ORDERING the Clerk of the Court reassign this case to the Honorable Carolyn K. Delaney. The parties shall please take note that all documents hereafter filed with the Clerk of the Court shall bear case No. 2:15-CV-1505 CKD. All currently scheduled dates presently set before Judge Mueller are hereby VACATED. (cc: KJM) (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KENNETH WAYNE PARKS, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:15-cv-1505 KJM CKD (PC) v. ORDER JEFFREY ROHLFLING, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Each of the parties in the above-captioned case has filed a “Consent to Proceed Before a 17 18 United States Magistrate Judge.” See 28 U.S.C. §636(a)(5) and (c). According to E.D. Cal. R. 19 305, both the district court judge assigned to the case and the magistrate judge must approve the 20 reference to the magistrate judge. The undersigned has reviewed the file herein and recommends that the above-captioned 21 22 case be reassigned and referred to the magistrate judge for all further proceedings and entry of 23 final judgment. 24 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court reassign this case to the Honorable 25 Carolyn K. Delaney. The parties shall please take note that all documents hereafter filed with the 26 Clerk of the Court shall bear case No. 2:15-CV-1505 CKD. All currently scheduled dates 27 presently set before Judge Mueller are hereby VACATED. 28 ///// 1 1 2 IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: October 1, 2018 3 4 5 6 Having also reviewed the file, I accept reference of this case for all further proceedings 7 and entry of final judgment. 8 Dated: October 3, 2018 9 10 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?