Parks v. Rolfing et al
Filing
129
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 11/15/19 as to 121 Amended Motion for Summary Judgment ( Motion Hearing set for 1/22/2020 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 24 (CKD) before Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney.) (Plummer, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
KENNETH WAYNE PARKS,
12
No. 2:15-cv-1505 KJM CKD P
Plaintiff,
13
v.
ORDER
14
JEFFREY ROHLFING, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding through counsel with a civil rights action pursuant
17
18
to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The parties have filed a stipulated request to continue the hearing on
19
defendants’ motion for summary judgment to January 22, 2020. ECF No. 128. Good cause
20
appearing, the request will be granted. However, in light of the currently scheduled pretrial
21
conference and trial, further continuances are unlikely to be granted.
The court notes that plaintiff’s counsel’s declaration in support of the continuance states
22
23
the he is still waiting for documents that plaintiff mistakenly sent to the court (ECF No. 128 at 3),
24
and on November 12, 2019, the court received a letter from plaintiff requesting that documents he
25
mistakenly sent to the court be forwarded to his attorney (ECF No. 126). The court received what
26
appeared to be the documents referenced in the letter. However, those documents were not
27
forwarded to counsel and were instead returned to plaintiff.
28
////
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the December 4, 2019 hearing on
2
defendants’ motion for summary judgment is continued to January 22, 2020, at 10:00 a.m.
3
Dated: November 15, 2019
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
4
5
6
7
13:park1505.continue
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?