Parks v. Rolfing et al

Filing 76

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 2/13/2018 GRANTING 75 Stipulation for Extension of Time. Defendants' opposition to 71 Motion to Amend due on or before 2/23/2018. (Henshaw, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 XAVIER BECERRA, State Bar No. 118517 Attorney General of California PAMELA J. HOLMES, State Bar No. 147360 Supervising Deputy Attorney General VICKIE P. WHITNEY, State Bar No. 145316 Deputy Attorney General 1300 I Street, Suite 125 P.O. Box 944255 Sacramento, CA 94244-2550 Telephone: (916) 210-7520 Fax: (916) 322-8288 E-mail: Attorneys for Defendants Rohlfing, Garbutt, Medina, and Miranda 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SACRAMENTO DIVISION 11 12 13 KENNETH WAYNE PARKS, 14 15 v. 16 2:15-cv-1505-KJM-CKD (PC) Plaintiff, STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND COMPLAINT; PROPOSED ORDER JEFFREY ROLFING, et al., 17 Judge: Defendants. The Honorable Carolyn K. Delaney 18 Action Filed: September 30, 2016 19 20 On January 19, 2018, Plaintiff filed a motion for leave to amend along with a proposed 21 Fourth Amended Complaint. (ECF No. 71.) A Notice of Errata (ECF No. 73), and Corrected 22 Notice of Motion and Motion (ECF No. 72), were filed on January 22, 2018. By Minute Order 23 dated January 22, 2018, the Court determined that the motion would be submitted without oral 24 argument, vacated the February 21, 2018 motion hearing, and ordered opposition and reply to 25 conform to the provisions of Local Rule 230. (ECF No. 74.) Pursuant to Local Rule 230 (l), 26 opposition to the motion is due February 9 under the original notice or February 12 under the 27 corrected notice. Nonetheless, due to defense counsel’s case matters, including preparation for 28 and conduct of an evidentiary hearing on February 6, 2018, before Judge Morrison England in 1 Stip. for Extension of Time for Defs. to File Opp’n to Mot. to Amend (2:15-cv-1505-KJM-CKD (PC)) 1 Allen v. Stott, E.D. Case No. 2:13-cv-1821, as well as an injury suffered by defense counsel, the 2 parties have stipulated to an extension of time such that Defendants’ opposition to Plaintiff’s 3 motion to amend shall be due on February 23, 2018, and Plaintiff’s reply, if any, shall be due 4 seven days thereafter, unless an extension of time is requested by Plaintiff. 5 SO STIPULATED. 6 Dated: February 9, 2018 Respectfully submitted, 7 XAVIER BECERRA Attorney General of California PAMELA J. HOLMES Supervising Deputy Attorney General 8 9 /s/ Vickie P. Whitney 10 VICKIE P. WHITNEY Deputy Attorney General Attorneys for Defendants Rohlfing, Garbutt, Medina, and Miranda 11 12 13 14 Dated: February 9, 2018 JEFF DOMINIC PRICE, Esq. /s/ Jeff Dominic Price 15 JEFF DOMINIC PRICE Deputy Attorney General Attorney for Plaintiff Kenneth Wayne Parks 16 17 18 [PROPOSED] ORDER 19 Based on the Stipulation of Counsel, and good cause shown, the Court grants the 20 stipulated extension of time requested. Defendants’ opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend 21 shall be due on or before February 23, 2018, and absent an extension of time, Plaintiff’s reply 22 shall be due on or before March 2, 2018. 23 Dated: February 13, 2018 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 24 25 26 27 13:park1505.stip.eot 28 2 Stip. for Extension of Time for Defs. to File Opp’n to Mot. to Amend (2:15-cv-1505-KJM-CKD (PC))

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?