Hoffmann v. Jones

Filing 67

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 7/30/2020 DENYING 63 request for voluntary dismissal without prejudice. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KASEY F. HOFFMAN, 12 No. 2:15-cv-1526-JAM-EFB P Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 KEVIN JONES, 15 ORDER Defendant. 16 17 18 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 19 U.S.C. § 1983. On June 1, 2020, plaintiff filed a notice of voluntary dismissal seeking dismissal 20 of this case without prejudice. ECF No. 63. On June 12, 2020, the court informed plaintiff that 21 he could not dismiss this case without prejudice at this stage of the proceedings unless defendant 22 stipulated to the dismissal. ECF No. 65 (citing Fed. R. Civ. P 41(a)(1)(A)(i)). Defendant has 23 declined to stipulate to the dismissal of this action without prejudice and confirms that defendant 24 remains ready for trial. ECF Nos. 64, 66. Defendant does not object to plaintiff voluntarily 25 dismissing with prejudice but defendant does not consent to plaintiff being able to refile this 26 action. ECF No. 66. Thus, plaintiff may either proceed with this action, with trial set to 27 commence on October 19, 2020, or the parties may file a stipulation for dismissal pursuant to 28 Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). 1 1 Accordingly, it is ORDERED that plaintiff’s request for voluntary dismissal without 2 prejudice (ECF No. 63) is denied. 3 DATED: July 30, 2020. 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?