Baricevic v.Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 18

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 3/14/2016 ORDERING that Within 14 days of this order, the Commissioner's counsel shall show cause why he should not be required to pay $250.00 in sanctions based on his failure to comply with the court's scheduling order; within 14 days of this order, the Commissioner shall file its opposition and cross-motion for summary judgment; Alternatively, if the Commissioner concludes that a stipulated remand is appropriate, the parties may file such a stipulation within 14 days of this order. (Reader, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LISA BARICEVIC, 12 13 14 15 16 No. 2:15-cv-1541-KJN Plaintiff, v. ORDER COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. 17 18 On December 14, 2015, plaintiff filed her motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 16.) 19 According to the court’s scheduling order, “Defendant’s opposition to a motion for summary 20 judgment and/or remand, if any, shall be filed within 30 days from service of plaintiff’s motion.” 21 (ECF No. 8.) Although that deadline has long passed, defendant has not filed an opposition and 22 cross-motion for summary judgment, nor has an extension of time been requested. 23 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 24 1. Within fourteen (14) days of this order, the Commissioner’s counsel shall show cause 25 why he should not be required to pay $250.00 in sanctions based on his failure to 26 comply with the court’s scheduling order. 27 28 2. Within fourteen (14) days of this order, the Commissioner shall file its opposition and cross-motion for summary judgment. Alternatively, if the Commissioner concludes 1 1 that a stipulated remand is appropriate, the parties may file such a stipulation within 2 fourteen (14) days of this order. No further extensions will be granted. 3 3. Failure to timely respond to all aspects of this order will be deemed to be the 4 Commissioner’s consent to the summary grant of plaintiff’s motion for summary 5 judgment. 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 14, 2016 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?