Baricevic v.Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 23

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 3/30/16: The order to show cause 18 is DISCHARGED. The Commissioner's cross-motion for summary judgment is deemed timely filed. Plaintiff may file a reply, if any, within 21 days of this order. Thereafter, the motions will be submitted for decision on the record and written briefing without oral argument. (Kaminski, H)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LISA BARICEVIC, 12 13 14 15 16 No. 2:15-cv-1541-KJN Plaintiff, v. ORDER COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. 17 18 On March 14, 2016, the court issued an order directing the Commissioner’s counsel to 19 show cause why he should not be sanctioned based on his failure to file a timely cross-motion for 20 summary judgment. (ECF No. 18.) Thereafter, the Commissioner filed its cross-motion for 21 summary judgment as well as a timely response to the order to show cause. (ECF Nos. 21, 22.) 22 In that response, the Commissioner’s counsel apologized to the court, accepted responsibility for 23 his omission, and indicated that he has taken several steps to improve his calendaring practices. 24 The court appreciates counsel’s candor, and in light of that response, discharges the order 25 to show cause. However, counsel is cautioned that future failure to comply with court orders and 26 deadlines will result in the imposition of sanctions. 27 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: 28 1. The order to show cause (ECF No. 18) is DISCHARGED. 1 1 2. The Commissioner’s cross-motion for summary judgment is deemed timely filed. 2 3. Plaintiff may file a reply, if any, within 21 days of this order. 3 4. Thereafter, the motions will be submitted for decision on the record and written 4 5 6 briefing without oral argument. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 30, 2016 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?