Hoffmann v. Lassen Adult Detention Facitity, et al.
Filing
126
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 7/25/2018 DENYING plaintiff's 124 request for disclosure of pretrial conference proceedings. (Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
KASEY F. HOFFMAN,
12
13
14
15
No. 2:15-cv-1558 JAM KJN P
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
LASSEN ADULT DETENTION
FACILITY, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
18
Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant
19
to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is set for a jury trial before the Honorable John A. Mendez on
20
October 22, 2018.
21
On July 20, 2018, plaintiff filed a pleading titled “Request for Disclosure of Pretrial
22
Conference Proceedings.” (ECF No. 124.) In this pleading, plaintiff states that he is under the
23
impression that a pretrial conference, on paper, has taken place. (Id.) Plaintiff requests a copy of
24
the transcript from this proceeding. (Id.) If no pretrial conference has occurred, plaintiff requests
25
that he be allowed to attend a pretrial conference via telephone or video conference. (Id.)
26
A pretrial conference was previously conducted, solely on the papers, in this action. On
27
March 2, 2018, the undersigned issued a pretrial order. (ECF No. 108.) On May 15, 2018, the
28
undersigned issued an order amending the pretrial order in response to plaintiff’s supplemental
1
1
2
pretrial statement. (ECF No. 114.)
Because the pretrial conference was conducted on paper, there are no transcripts from this
3
proceeding. No further pretrial conference hearings will be held, unless ordered by Judge
4
Mendez.
5
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s July 20, 2018 request for
6
disclosure of pretrial conference proceedings is denied.
7
Dated: July 25, 2018
8
9
10
11
Hoff1558.pt.kc
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?