Hoffmann v. Lassen Adult Detention Facitity, et al.
Filing
134
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 10/2/2018 ADOPTING IN FULL 130 Findings and Recommendations; DENYING 127 Motion to Consolidate Cases. (Michel, G.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
KASEY F. HOFFMAN,
11
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
No. 2:15-cv-1558 JAM KJN P
v.
ORDER
LASSEN ADULT DETENTION
FACILITY, et al.,
Defendants.
15
16
17
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief
18
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
19
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On September 14, 2018, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein
20
21
which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to
22
the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Defendant has filed
23
objections to the findings and recommendations.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this
24
25
court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the
26
court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper
27
analysis.
28
/////
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. The findings and recommendations filed September 14, 2018 are adopted in full; and
3
2. Defendant’s motion to consolidate 15-1526 and 1558 for trial (ECF No. 127) is denied.
4
5
6
7
Dated: October 2, 2018
/s/ John A. Mendez
HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?