Hoffmann v. Lassen Adult Detention Facitity, et al.

Filing 37

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/27/16 DISREGARDING 28 Motion for Discovery. Plaintiff is cautioned that further filing of discovery requests or responses, except as required by rule of court, may result in an order of sanctions, including, but not limited to, a recommendation that this action be dismissed. (Dillon, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

KASEY F. HOFFMAN,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14
15

No. 2: 15-cv-1558 JAM KJN P

v.

ORDER

LASSEN ADULT DETENTION
FACILITY, et al.,
Defendants.

16
17

Plaintiff has filed a document entitled “Motion for Discovery.” (ECF No. 28.) Plaintiff is

18
19

informed that court permission is not necessary for discovery requests and that neither discovery

20

requests served on an opposing party nor that party’s responses should be filed until such time as

21

a party becomes dissatisfied with a response and seeks relief from the court pursuant to the

22

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Discovery requests between the parties shall not be filed with

23

the court unless, and until, they are at issue.

24

////

25

////

26

////

27

////

28

////
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s “Motion for Discovery” (ECF

2

No. 28.) will be disregarded. Plaintiff is cautioned that further filing of discovery requests or

3

responses, except as required by rule of court, may result in an order of sanctions, including, but

4

not limited to, a recommendation that this action be dismissed.

5

Dated: June 27, 2016

6
7
8
9

Hoff1558.411

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2