Hoffmann v. Lassen Adult Detention Facitity, et al.
Filing
8
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 8/19/2015 DISMISSING plaintiff's amended complaint with 30 days to file a second amended complaint; and the Clerk shall send plaintiff a civil rights complaint form.(Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
KASEY F. HOFFMAN,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
No. 2: 15-cv-1558 KJN P
v.
ORDER
LASSEN ADULT DETENTION
FACILITY, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff is a prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant to 42
18
19
U.S.C. § 1983. On July 29, 2015, the undersigned dismissed plaintiff’s complaint with leave to
20
amend. (ECF No. 4.) Pending before the court is plaintiff’s amended complaint filed August 10,
21
2015. (ECF No. 6.)
Plaintiff alleges that he was denied a Kosher diet in violation of his constitutional rights.
22
23
However, plaintiff does not clearly identify the defendants. After reviewing the amended
24
complaint, it is not clear to the undersigned who plaintiff intends to name as defendants. On this
25
ground, the amended complaint is dismissed with leave to amend. If plaintiff files a second
26
amended complaint, he shall clearly identify the defendants. Plaintiff’s second amended
27
complaint shall also be prepared on the complaint form attached to the instant order.
28
////
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. Plaintiff’s amended complaint (ECF No. 6) is dismissed with thirty days to file a
3
second amended complaint; failure to file a second amended complaint within that time will
4
result in dismissal of this action;
5
2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff the form for a civil rights complaint
6
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
7
Dated: August 19, 2015
8
9
10
Hoff1558.ame
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?