Hoffmann v. Lassen Adult Detention Facitity, et al.

Filing 99

ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 9/28/17 ORDERING that the FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS filed 6/12/17 95 are ADOPTED in full; Plaintiff's MOTION for Summary Judgment 65 is DENIED. Defendants' MOTION for SUMMARY JUDGMENT 81 is DENIED as to Plaintiff's First Amendment claim against defendant Jones and GRANTED in all other respects. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

KASEY F. HOFFMAN,

12
13
14
15

No. 2: 15-cv-1558 JAM KJN P

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER

LASSEN ADULT DETENTION
FACILITY, et al.,
Defendants.

16
17
18

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief

19

under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to

20

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

21

On June 12, 2017, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which

22

were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the

23

findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed

24

objections to the findings and recommendations.

25

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

26

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

27

ORDERED that:

28

1. The findings and recommendations filed June 12, 2017, are adopted in full;
1

1

2. Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 65) is denied;

2

3. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 81) is denied as to plaintiff’s

3

First Amendment claim against defendant Jones and granted in all other respects.

4

DATED: September 28, 2017

5

/s/ John A. Mendez________________________

6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2