Wormuth et al v. Lammersville Union School District et al

Filing 129

STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING CERTAIN CLAIMS signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 8/14/17 ORDERING that Plaintiffs' sixth claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress against all Defendants is dismissed with prejudice, with said parties to bear their own costs, attorneys' fees, and other expenses of litigation; Plaintiff H.W.'s first claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Defendants Gill, Nicholas, and Ibbs is dismissed with prejudice, with said parti es to bear their own costs, attorneys'fees, and other expenses of litigation, Plaintiff H.W.'s fifth claim under the Unruh Act against Defendants Gill, Nicholas, and Ibbs is dismissed with prejudice, with said parties to bear their own cost s, attorneys fees, andother expenses of litigation; Plaintiff H.W.'s seventh claim under Education Code § 220 against Defendants Nicholas, Gill, Yeager, and Ibbs is dismissed with prejudice, with said parties to bear their own costs, attor neys fees, and other expenses of litigation, and Plaintiffs' claim for punitive damages against all Defendants is dismissed with prejudice, with said parties to bear their own costs, attorneys' fees, and other expenses oflitigation.(Becknal, R)

Download PDF
1 Cornelius J. Callahan, SBN 202585 Stephanie Y. Wu, SBN 268948 2 McCORMICK, BARSTOW, SHEPPARD, WAYTE & CARRUTH LLP 3 1125 I Street, Suite 1 Modesto, California 95354 4 T: (209) 524-1100 | F: (209) 524-1188 neil.callahan@mccormickbarstow.com 5 stephanie.wu@mccormickbarstow.com 6 Attorneys for Defendants, LAMMERSVILLE JOINT UNIFIED SCHOOL 7 DISTRICT, JAMES YEAGER, DAWN IBBS, KIRK NICHOLAS, and KHUSHWINDER GILL 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ADRIANNA WORMUTH, SCOTT 12 WORMUTH and H.W., a minor, by and through his guardians ad litem ADRIANNA 13 WORMUTH and SCOTT WORMUTH, Plaintiffs, 14 15 Case No. 2:15-CV-01572-KJM-EFB STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING CERTAIN CLAIMS v. 16 LAMMERSVILLE UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT, JAMES YEAGER, DAWN IBBS, 17 TERESA HAUN, KIRK NICHOLAS, and KHUSHWINDER GILL, and DOES 1-30, 18 Defendants. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Plaintiffs ADRIANNA WORMUTH, SCOTT WORMUTH and H.W., a minor, by and through his guardians ad litem ADRIANNA WORMUTH and SCOTT WORMUTH (“Plaintiffs”), and Defendants LAMMERSVILLE JOINT UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, JAMES YEAGER, DAWN IBBS, KIRK NICHOLAS, and KHUSHWINDER GILL (“Defendants”), pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a), hereby stipulate that: 1. Plaintiffs’ sixth claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress against all Defendants should be dismissed with prejudice, with said parties to bear their own costs, attorneys’ fees, and other expenses of litigation, 28 1 STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING CERTAIN CLAIMS 1 2. Plaintiff H.W.’s first claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Defendants Gill and 2 Nicholas should be dismissed with prejudice, with said parties to bear their own costs, attorneys’ 3 fees, and other expenses of litigation, 4 3. Plaintiff H.W.’s fifth claim under the Unruh Act against Defendants Gill and 5 Nicholas should be dismissed with prejudice, with said parties to bear their own costs, attorneys’ 6 fees, and other expenses of litigation, 7 4. Plaintiff H.W.’s seventh claim under Education Code § 220 against Defendants 8 Nicholas, Gill, and Yeager, should be dismissed with prejudice, with said parties to bear their own 9 costs, attorneys’ fees, and other expenses of litigation, and 10 5. Plaintiffs’ claim for punitive damages against all Defendants should be dismissed 11 with prejudice, with said parties to bear their own costs, attorneys’ fees, and other expenses of 12 litigation. 13 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 14 15 16 LAW OFFICES OF PETER ALFERT Dated: August 9, 2017 17 /s/ Peter Alfert Peter Alfert Attorney for Plaintiffs, ADRIANNA WORMUTH, SCOTT WORMUTH and H.W., a minor By: 18 19 20 21 McCORMICK, BARSTOW, SHEPPARD, WAYTE & CARRUTH LLP 22 Dated: August 9, 2017 23 24 25 26 /s/ Stephanie Y Wu Stephanie Y. Wu Attorney for Defendants, LAMMERSVILLE UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT, JAMES YEAGER, DAWN IBBS, KIRK NICHOLAS, and KHUSHWINDER GILL By: 27 28 2 STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING CERTAIN CLAIMS 1 2 Dated: August 4, 2017 ALLARD, COWPERTHWAITE & GELINI By: 3 4 /s/ Mark P Edson Mark P. Edson Attorneys for Defendants, NARESH SINGH, MRINAL SINGH 5 6 7 // 8 // 9 // 10 // 11 // 12 13 // 14 // 15 // 16 // 17 // 18 // 19 // 20 21 // 22 // 23 // 24 // 25 26 // // 27 28 // 3 STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING CERTAIN CLAIMS 1 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER Pursuant to the Stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing, the Court HEREBY 3 ORDERS that: 4 1. Plaintiffs’ sixth claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress against all 5 Defendants is dismissed with prejudice, with said parties to bear their own costs, attorneys’ fees, 6 and other expenses of litigation, 7 2. Plaintiff H.W.’s first claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Defendants Gill, 8 Nicholas, and Ibbs is dismissed with prejudice, with said parties to bear their own costs, attorneys’ 9 fees, and other expenses of litigation, 10 3. Plaintiff H.W.’s fifth claim under the Unruh Act against Defendants Gill, Nicholas, 11 and Ibbs is dismissed with prejudice, with said parties to bear their own costs, attorneys’ fees, and 12 other expenses of litigation, 13 4. Plaintiff H.W.’s seventh claim under Education Code § 220 against Defendants 14 Nicholas, Gill, Yeager, and Ibbs is dismissed with prejudice, with said parties to bear their own 15 costs, attorneys’ fees, and other expenses of litigation, and 16 5. Plaintiffs’ claim for punitive damages against all Defendants is dismissed with 17 prejudice, with said parties to bear their own costs, attorneys’ fees, and other expenses of 18 litigation. 19 IT IS SO ORDERED. 20 21 DATED: August 14, 2017. 22 23 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 24 25 26 27 28 4 STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING CERTAIN CLAIMS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?