Wormuth et al v. Lammersville Union School District et al
Filing
218
STIPULATION and ORDER of DISMISSAL signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 7/31/18, ORDERING that pursuant to the parties 216 stipulation, all cross-claims brought against Cross Defendants Naresh Singh, Mrinal Singh are DISMISSED with pre judice and all of Plaintiff H.W.'s claims and causes of action against defendants Lammersville Joint Unified School District (erroneously sued as Lammersville Union School District), James Yeager, Dawn Ibbs, Teresa Haun, Kirk Nicholas and Khushwinder Gill are DISMISSED with prejudice. The court DISCHARGES its 213 order to show cause. CASE CLOSED (Kastilahn, A)
1 PETER W. ALFERT, SBN 83139
IAN A. HANSEN, SBN 255449
2 LAW OFFICES OF PETER ALFERT
A Professional Corporation
3 200 Pringle Ave., Suite 450
Walnut Creek, California 94596
4 Telephone: (925) 279-3009
Facsimile: (925) 279-3342
5
TODD BOLEY, SBN 68119
6 LAW OFFICE OF TODD BOLEY
2381 Mariner Square, Suite 280
7 Alameda, CA 94501
Telephone: (510) 836-4500
8 Facsimile: (510) 649-5170
9 RHONDA D. KRAEBER, SBN 154665
KRAEBER LAW OFFICE
10 1191 Central Blvd., STE C
Brentwood, CA 94513
11
Telephone: (925) 513-1264
12 Facsimile: (925) 392-0433
13 Attorneys for Plaintiffs
14
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
17 ADRIANNA WORMUTH, SCOTT
WORMUTH and H.W., a minor, by and
18 through his guardians ad litem ADRIANNA
WORMUTH and SCOTT WORMUTH,
19
Plaintiffs,
20
v.
21
LAMMERSVILLE UNION SCHOOL
22 DISTRICT, JAMES YEAGER, DAWN IBBS,
TERESA HAUN, KIRK NICHOLAS, and
23 KHUSHWINDER GILL, and DOES 1-30,
24
Case No. 2:15-CV-01572-KJM-EFB
STIPULATION AND ORDER OF
DISMISSAL
Defendants.
25
26
27
28
1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL
1
It is hereby stipulated between Plaintiff H.W., by and through his guardians ad litem, SCOTT
2 WORMUTH and ADRIANNA WORMUTH, and Defendants LAMMERSVILLE JOINT
3 UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT (erroneously sued as Lammersville Union School District),
4 JAMES YEAGER, DAWN IBBS, TERESA HAUN, KIRK NICHOLAS, and KHUSHWINDER
5 GILL, and Cross Defendants NARESH SINGH, MRINAL SINGH by and through their respective
6 counsel of record, that the above-referenced action should be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to
7 F.R.C.P. 41 as to all claims, cross-claims and causes of action against defendants and cross8 defendants. The parties further stipulate that the parties release each other for attorneys’ fees,
9 expenses and costs.
10 IT IS SO STIPULATED.
11
12 Dated: July 10, 2018
LAW OFFICES OF PETER ALFERT
13
/s/ Ian A. Hansen
Ian A. Hansen
Attorney for Plaintiffs,
ADRIANNA WORMUTH, SCOTT WORMUTH
and H.W., a minor
By:
14
15
16
17
18
Dated: July 10, 2018
19
McCORMICK, BARSTOW, SHEPPARD,
WAYTE & CARRUTH LLP
/s/ Stephanie Wu
Stephanie Wu
Attorney for Defendants,
LAMMERSVILLE UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT,
JAMES YEAGER, DAWN IBBS, KIRK
NICHOLAS, and KHUSHWINDER GILL
By:
20
21
22
23
24 Dated: July 10, 2018
25
ALLARD, COWPERTHWAITE & GELINI
By:
26
27
/s/ Mark P. Edson
Mark P. Edson
Attorneys for Cross-Defendants,
NARESH SINGH, MRINAL SINGH
28
2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL
1 Dated: July 10, 2018
KRAEBER LAW OFFICE
2
/s/ Rhonda D. Kraeber
Rhonda D. Kraeber
Attorney for Plaintiffs,
ADRIANNA WORMUTH, SCOTT WORMUTH
and H.W., a minor
By:
3
4
5
6
ORDER
7
Pursuant to the Stipulation of the parties, all cross-claims brought against Cross Defendants
8
9 NARESH SINGH, MRINAL SINGH are dismissed with prejudice and all of Plaintiff H.W.’s claims
10 and causes of action against defendants LAMMERSVILLE JOINT UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
11
(erroneously sued as Lammersville Union School District), JAMES YEAGER, DAWN IBBS,
12
TERESA HAUN, KIRK NICHOLAS, and KHUSHWINDER GILL are dismissed with prejudice.
13
14
In light of this stipulation, the court DISCHARGES its July 5, 2018 order to show cause (ECF No.
15 213).
16
IT IS SO ORDERED.
17 DATED: July 31, 2018.
18
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?