Rogers v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 20

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 3/16/2016 ORDERING 19 that Defendant shall file her cross-motion and response to plaintiff's motion for summary judgment on or before 4/18/2016. Plaintiff shall file any reply thereto on or before 5/2/2016. (Reader, L)

1
2
3
4
5

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
DEBORAH LEE STACHEL
Acting Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX
Social Security Administration
SHARON LAHEY
California State Bar No. 263027
Special Assistant United States Attorney

6
7
8
9
10

160 Spear Street, Suite 800
San Francisco, California 94105
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-Mail: [e-mail]
ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT

11
12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

13

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

14

SACRAMENTO DIVISION

15

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

16

GEORGETTE ROGERS,

17

Plaintiff,

18

vs.

19
20
21

CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner
Of Social Security,
Defendant.

CIVIL NO. 2:15-cv-01574-EFB
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED
ORDER FOR DEFENDANT’S FIRST
EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND
TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT

22
23

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between Georgette Rogers (“Plaintiff”) and Carolyn W.

24

Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security (“Defendant”) (collectively, the “Parties”), by and

25

through their respective counsel of record, that Defendant shall have an extension of time of 30 days to

26

respond to Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and/or to file any cross-motions. The current due

27

date is March 18, 2016. The new due date will be April 18, 2016. This is the first extension of time

28

requested by Defendant and the third extension of time requested in the above-captioned matter.
STIPULATION & PROPOSED ORDER

1

(CIVIL NO. 2:15-cv-01574-EFB)

1
Defense counsel requires additional time to adequately address the issues Plaintiff raises in her motion
2
for summary judgment due to workload demands, which include preparing nine dispositive motions
3
4

during the remainder of March 2016.
The parties further stipulate that the Court’s Scheduling Order shall be modified accordingly.

5

Respectfully submitted,

6
7

Dated: March 16, 2016

PETER BRIXIE
Attorney At Law

8
By: /s/ Peter Brixie*
PETER BRIXIE
(*As authorized by email on March 16, 2016)
Attorneys for Plaintiff

9
10
11
12

Dated: March 16, 2016

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney

13
14

By: /s/ Sharon Lahey
SHARON LAHEY
Special Assistant U. S. Attorney
Attorneys for Defendant

15
16
17
18
19

ORDER
Pursuant to stipulation, good cause appearing, IT IS SO ORDERED. Defendant shall file her

20

cross-motion and response to plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment on or before April 18, 2016.

21

Plaintiff shall file any reply thereto on or before May 2, 2016.

22
23

DATED: March 16, 2016.

____________________________
HON. EDMUND F. BRENNAN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION & PROPOSED ORDER

2

(CIVIL NO. 2:15-cv-01574-EFB)