Heilman v. Whitten, et al
Filing
12
ORDER, FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 1/25/2016 ORDERING service is appropriate for M. Dooley, E. Mendonsa, A. Whitten; and the Clerk shall send plaintiff forms for service to be completed and return ed within 30 days, along with the Notice of Submission. IT IS RECOMMENDED that all defendants and claims be dismissed from this action except First Amendment retaliation claims against defendants Whitten, Dooley and Mendosa. Referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr.; Objections due within 14 days. (Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
THOMAS JOHN HEILMAN,
12
13
14
15
No. 2:15-cv-1585 MCE CKD P
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER AND
A. WHITTEN, et al.,
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Defendants.
16
17
18
Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, who seeks relief
19
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On September 25, 2015, plaintiff’s original complaint was
20
dismissed for failure to state a claim. (ECF No. 6.) Plaintiff has filed a first amended complaint
21
(FAC), now before the court for screening. (ECF No. 11.) See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a).
22
Construing the FAC in the light most favorable to plaintiff, the undersigned concludes that
23
it states a First Amendment retaliation claim against defendants Whitten, Dooley, and Mendosa.
24
As to plaintiff’s access-to-courts claim, the FAC fails to cure the defects of the original complaint
25
as set forth in the September 25, 2015 screening order.
26
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
27
1. Service is appropriate for the following defendants: Whitten, Dooley, and Mendosa.
28
2. The Clerk of the Court shall send plaintiff three USM-285 forms, one summons, an
1
1
2
instruction sheet and a copy of the amended complaint filed November 2, 2015.
3. Within thirty days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall complete the attached
3
Notice of Submission of Documents and submit the following documents to the court:
4
a. The completed Notice of Submission of Documents;
5
b. One completed summons;
6
c. One completed USM-285 form for each defendant listed in number 1 above;
7
d. Four copies of the endorsed amended complaint filed November 2, 2015.
8
4. Plaintiff need not attempt service on defendants and need not request waiver of service.
9
Upon receipt of the above-described documents, the court will direct the United States Marshal to
10
serve the above-named defendants pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4 without payment
11
of costs.
12
IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that all defendants and claims be dismissed from this
13
action except First Amendment retaliation claims against defendants Whitten, Dooley, and
14
Mendosa.
15
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge
16
assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days
17
after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections
18
with the court. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings
19
and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified
20
time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153
21
(9th Cir. 1991).
22
Dated: January 25, 2016
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
23
24
25
26
27
28
2 / heil1585.fac_fr
2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
THOMAS JOHN HEILMAN,
13
14
15
No. 2:15-cv-1585 MCE CKD P
Plaintiff,
v.
NOTICE OF SUBMISSION OF
DOCUMENTS
A. WHITTEN, et al.,
16
Defendants.
17
18
19
Plaintiff hereby submits the following documents in compliance with the court's order
filed _____________________:
20
____
completed summons form
21
____
completed USM-285 forms
22
____
copies of the ___________________
Complaint
23
24
DATED:
25
26
27
________________________________
28
Plaintiff
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?