SOURCiS, Inc. v. Bravo Development Group, LLC
Filing
48
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 12/15/15 GRANTING Plaintiff's Ex Parte Motion for Extensions of time in which to file oppositions to Defendants Bravo, Inc. and Derek Deckers's Motions to Dismiss and Motions to Strike. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
BURGOYNE LAW GROUP
Henry M. Burgoyne, III (SBN 203748)
Joseph S. Chun (SBN 240208)
870 Market Street, Suite 985
San Francisco, CA 94102
Telephone: (916) 209-0910
Fax: (415) 680-2335
Hank@BurgoyneLawGroup.com
Joseph@BurgoyneLawGroup.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff SOURCiS, Inc.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SACRAMENTO
9
10
SOURCIS, INC., a California corporation,
11
12
13
14
15
16
CASE NO. 2:15-CV-01588-TLN-KJN
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S EX
PARTE MOTION FOR EXTENSIONS OF
TIME IN WHICH TO FILE OPPOSITIONS
TO DEFENDANTS BRAVO, INC. AND
DEREK DECKERS’ MOTIONS TO
DISMISS AND MOTIONS TO STRIKE
STRATEGIC LAWSUIT AGAINST PUBLIC
PARTICIPATION (ANTI-SLAPP)
Plaintiff,
v.
BRAVO DEVELOPMENT GROUP, INC., a
California corporation; DEREK C. DECKER,
an individual; and DOES 2 through 50,
inclusive;
Defendants.
17
18
Good cause appearing, on ex parte motion of Plaintiff SOURCiS, Inc. (“SOURCiS”), it is
19
hereby ordered that: 1) SOURCiS shall have until 12:40 am on November 21, 2015 to file its
20
Oppositions to Defendant Bravo Development Group, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 15
21
dated October 12, 2015) and Motion to Strike (Docket No. 14, dated October 12, 2015); and 2)
22
SOURCiS shall have until 12:40 am on November 26, 2015 to file its Opposition to Defendant
23
Derek Decker’s Motion to Dismiss.
24
25
26
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: December 15, 2015
27
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
28
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S EX PARTE
MOTION FOR EXTENSIONS OF TIME
Case No.: 2:15-CV-01588-TLN-KJN
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?