SOURCiS, Inc. v. Bravo Development Group, LLC

Filing 48

ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 12/15/15 GRANTING Plaintiff's Ex Parte Motion for Extensions of time in which to file oppositions to Defendants Bravo, Inc. and Derek Deckers's Motions to Dismiss and Motions to Strike. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 BURGOYNE LAW GROUP Henry M. Burgoyne, III (SBN 203748) Joseph S. Chun (SBN 240208) 870 Market Street, Suite 985 San Francisco, CA 94102 Telephone: (916) 209-0910 Fax: (415) 680-2335 Hank@BurgoyneLawGroup.com Joseph@BurgoyneLawGroup.com Attorneys for Plaintiff SOURCiS, Inc. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SACRAMENTO 9 10 SOURCIS, INC., a California corporation, 11 12 13 14 15 16 CASE NO. 2:15-CV-01588-TLN-KJN ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S EX PARTE MOTION FOR EXTENSIONS OF TIME IN WHICH TO FILE OPPOSITIONS TO DEFENDANTS BRAVO, INC. AND DEREK DECKERS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND MOTIONS TO STRIKE STRATEGIC LAWSUIT AGAINST PUBLIC PARTICIPATION (ANTI-SLAPP) Plaintiff, v. BRAVO DEVELOPMENT GROUP, INC., a California corporation; DEREK C. DECKER, an individual; and DOES 2 through 50, inclusive; Defendants. 17 18 Good cause appearing, on ex parte motion of Plaintiff SOURCiS, Inc. (“SOURCiS”), it is 19 hereby ordered that: 1) SOURCiS shall have until 12:40 am on November 21, 2015 to file its 20 Oppositions to Defendant Bravo Development Group, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 15 21 dated October 12, 2015) and Motion to Strike (Docket No. 14, dated October 12, 2015); and 2) 22 SOURCiS shall have until 12:40 am on November 26, 2015 to file its Opposition to Defendant 23 Derek Decker’s Motion to Dismiss. 24 25 26 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 15, 2015 27 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 28 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S EX PARTE MOTION FOR EXTENSIONS OF TIME Case No.: 2:15-CV-01588-TLN-KJN 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?