Smith v. Albee et al

Filing 98

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 12/28/2020 DENYING 97 Motion for Extension of Time to File a Separate Supplemental Reply. (Henshaw, R)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

MICHAEL LENOIR SMITH,

12
13
14

No. 2:15-cv-1598 JAM KJN P

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER

SGT. GREGORY, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
17

Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se. On December 9, 2020, plaintiff filed a

18

motion for extension of time to file a separate supplemental reply. (ECF No. 97.) However,

19

plaintiff already filed a reply and an addition to his reply to defendants’ response to plaintiff’s

20

objections to the September 22, 2020 findings and recommendations. Moreover, on December 8,

21

2020, the same day plaintiff signed the instant motion, the district court adopted the findings and

22

recommendations, and judgment was entered for defendants. Thus, plaintiff’s motion is denied.

23

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion (ECF No. 97) is denied.

24

Dated: December 28, 2020

25
26
27
smit1598.36d

28
1