IN RE: William Cheng; Janet Cheng

Filing 30

ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 04/11/16 DENYING 28 Motion to Set Aside Order Dismissing Appeal. (Jackson, T)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

WILLIAM CHENG and JANET CHENG,

12
13
14
15

No. 2:15-cv-01617-TLN

Appellants,
v.
ARTHUR OSTERBACK, et al.

ORDER DENYING APPEALLANTS’
MOTION TO SET ASIDE THIS COURT’S
ORDER DISMISSING APPELLANT’S
BANKRUPTCY APPEAL

Appellees.

16
17

This matter is before the Court pursuant to Appellants William and Janet Cheng’s

18

(“Appellants”) motion to set aside this Court’s order dismissing Appellant’s bankruptcy appeal.

19

(ECF No. 28.) Under Local Rule 230(j), when a motion for reconsideration is made, the party

20

must provide the court with “what new or different facts or circumstances are claimed to exist

21

which did not exist or were not shown upon such prior motion, or what other grounds exist for the

22

motion; and why the facts or circumstances were not shown at the time of the prior motion.” L.R.

23

230(j)(3)‒(4). Appellants have failed to allege as such. Appellants briefing is thus deficient and

24

their motion (ECF No. 28) is thus DENIED.

25
26

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 11, 2016

27

Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge

28
1