Dorken v. Demilec, Inc., et al.

Filing 37

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 6/2/16: HEARING as to 29 Motion for Good Faith Settlement Determination RESET for 6/30/2016 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2 (TLN) before District Judge Troy L. Nunley. (Kaminski, H)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 JILL J. LIFTER, ESQ. (State Bar No. 120832) RYAN & LIFTER A Professional Corporation 2000 Crow Canyon Place, Suite 400 San Ramon, CA 94583-1367 Tel: (925) 884-2080 Fax: (925) 884-2090 Attorneys for Defendant and Cross-Defendant DEMILEC, INC. 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO DIVISION 9 RYAN & LIFTER A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 10 H. BRAD DORKEN, 11 Plaintiff, 12 CASE NO.: 2:15-CV-01628-TLN-CMK STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON DEFENDANT CASCADE FOAM INSULATION LLC DOING BUSINESS AS CASCADE FOAM INSULATION’S NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR GOOD FAITH SETTLEMENT DETERMINATION (Docket #29); and ORDER THEREON vs. 13 14 15 DEMILEC, INC.; CASCADE FOAM INSULATION; PAUL LENNON dba PBL DESIGNS; and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, DATE: TIME: Courtroom: 16 17 18 Defendants. June 16, 2016 2:00 p.m. 2 AND RELATED CROSS-ACTIONS 19 20 Plaintiff H. Brad Dorken and defendants Cascade Foam Insulation LLC, doing 21 business as Cascade Foam Insulation, and Demilec, Inc., by and through their respective 22 counsel of record, (the “Parties”) hereby agree and stipulate that the hearing on Defendant 23 Cascade Foam Insulation LLC doing business as Cascade Foam Insulation’s Notice of Motion 24 and Motion for Good Faith Settlement Determination (Docket #29) be continued from 25 June 16, 2016 at 2:00 p.m. to June 30, 2016 at 2:00 p.m. and that the deadlines for filing any 26 opposition and any reply to the opposition be based on the continued hearing date. The Parties 27 further agree and stipulate that good cause exists to continue the hearing, because they have 28 1 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON DEFENDANT CASCADE FOAM INSULATION LLC DOING BUSINESS AS CASCADE FOAM INSULATION’S NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR GOOD FAITH SETTLEMENT DETERMINATION (Docket #29); and ORDER THEREON G:\DOCS\TLN\CHAMBER DOCUMENTS\iFolder Documents\TO TLN - CIVIL ORDERS\15cv1628.stipo.0602.dorken.docx 1 reached a conditional agreement in which Demilec, Inc., non-settling party, will stipulate to 2 the motion being granted if certain conditions are met, those conditions have not yet been met 3 before Demilec, Inc. would otherwise be required to file an opposition to the motion based on 4 the current hearing date, and the conditions are now expected to be met in sufficient time 5 before the continued hearing date to allow a stipulation for the motion being granted to be 6 filed and processed before the continued hearing. The Parties hereby approve the agreed order 7 on this stipulation and they jointly apply for the order to be entered forthwith. 8 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 9 Date: June 2, 2016 MAIRE & DEEDON RYAN & LIFTER A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 10 11 By ___/s/______________________________ Mark Hardy Attorneys for Plaintiff H. Brad Dorken 12 13 14 15 Date: June 2, 2016 GILBERT KELLY CROWLY & JENNETT LLP 16 By ___/s/______________________________ David M. Daniels Attorneys for Defendant Cascade Foam Insulation, LLC 17 18 19 Date: June 2, 2016 20 RYAN & LIFTER A Professional Corporation 21 By __/s/Jill J. Lifter______________ JILL J. LIFTER Attorneys for Defendant/Cross-Defendant DEMILEC, INC. 22 23 24 25 IT IS SO ORDERED: 26 Dated: June 2, 2016 27 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 28 2 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON DEFENDANT CASCADE FOAM INSULATION LLC DOING BUSINESS AS CASCADE FOAM INSULATION’S NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR GOOD FAITH SETTLEMENT DETERMINATION (Docket #29); and ORDER THEREON G:\DOCS\TLN\CHAMBER DOCUMENTS\iFolder Documents\TO TLN - CIVIL ORDERS\15cv1628.stipo.0602.dorken.docx

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?