Allen v. California State Prison - SAC
Filing
16
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 1/10/2017 DENYING petitioner's 15 motion for appointment of counsel. This case will remain closed and any further filings in this case will be disregarded and no orders will issue in response to future filings. The Clerk shall send plaintiff a prisoner complaint form. (Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MICHAEL DEWAYNE ALLEN,
12
Petitioner,
13
14
No. 2:15-cv-1637 AC P
v.
ORDER
CALIFORNIA STATE PRISON - SAC,
15
Respondent.
16
This petition for writ of habeas corpus was dismissed on May 25, 2016. ECF Nos. 13, 14.
17
18
Petitioner has now filed a request for appointment of counsel in which he asserts that he did not
19
understand the court’s previous orders and that he meant to file a civil rights complaint rather
20
than a habeas petition. ECF No. 15. Even if petitioner did not understand what information the
21
court was asking him to provide, he failed to respond to the court’s previous orders in any way,
22
even if only to notify the court that he did not understand what was being asked of him.
23
Petitioner has not shown good cause to re-open this case and it will therefore remain closed and
24
his request for counsel will be denied. However, the Clerk of the Court will be directed to send
25
petitioner a prisoner complaint form in the event he wants to pursue a separate civil rights action.
26
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
27
1. Petitioner’s motion for appointment of counsel (ECF No 15) is denied.
28
////
1
2
3
2. This case will remain closed and any further filings in this case will be disregarded and
no orders will issue in response to future filings.
3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff a copy of the prisoner complaint
4
form used in this district.
5
DATED: January 10, 2017
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?