Allen v. California State Prison - SAC

Filing 16

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 1/10/2017 DENYING petitioner's 15 motion for appointment of counsel. This case will remain closed and any further filings in this case will be disregarded and no orders will issue in response to future filings. The Clerk shall send plaintiff a prisoner complaint form. (Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MICHAEL DEWAYNE ALLEN, 12 Petitioner, 13 14 No. 2:15-cv-1637 AC P v. ORDER CALIFORNIA STATE PRISON - SAC, 15 Respondent. 16 This petition for writ of habeas corpus was dismissed on May 25, 2016. ECF Nos. 13, 14. 17 18 Petitioner has now filed a request for appointment of counsel in which he asserts that he did not 19 understand the court’s previous orders and that he meant to file a civil rights complaint rather 20 than a habeas petition. ECF No. 15. Even if petitioner did not understand what information the 21 court was asking him to provide, he failed to respond to the court’s previous orders in any way, 22 even if only to notify the court that he did not understand what was being asked of him. 23 Petitioner has not shown good cause to re-open this case and it will therefore remain closed and 24 his request for counsel will be denied. However, the Clerk of the Court will be directed to send 25 petitioner a prisoner complaint form in the event he wants to pursue a separate civil rights action. 26 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 27 1. Petitioner’s motion for appointment of counsel (ECF No 15) is denied. 28 //// 1 2 3 2. This case will remain closed and any further filings in this case will be disregarded and no orders will issue in response to future filings. 3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff a copy of the prisoner complaint 4 form used in this district. 5 DATED: January 10, 2017 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?