Howze v. Malmendier, et al.
Filing
20
ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 3/30/2016 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 15 are ADOPTED in FULL; Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice as against all defendants other than defendants Stephens and Steele; and this case is REFERRED back to the assigned magistrate judge for all further pretrial proceedings. (Reader, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
J. L. HOWZE,
12
No. 2:15-cv-1638 WBS CKD P
Plaintiff,
13
v.
ORDER
14
RICK MALMENDIER, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief
18
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
19
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On March 10, 2016, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein
20
21
which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the
22
findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed
23
objections to the findings and recommendations.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this
24
25
court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the
26
court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper
27
analysis.
28
/////
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. The findings and recommendations filed March 10, 2016, are adopted in full;
3
2. Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint is dismissed without prejudice as against all
4
5
defendants other than defendants Stephens and Steele; and
3. This case is referred back to the assigned magistrate judge for all further pretrial
6
proceedings.
7
Dated: March 30, 2016
8
9
10
11
12
13
/howz1638.804
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?