Howze v. Malmendier, et al.

Filing 24

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 8/3/2016 GRANTING defendants' 23 request for an extension of time; defendants need not file a response to plaintiff's amended complaint until further notice from the court; plaintiff shall file an opposition to defendants' 23 motion to revoke plaintiff's IFP status within 30 days. (Yin, K)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

J.L. HOWZE,

12
13

No. 2:15-cv-1638 WBS CKD P
Plaintiff,

v.

ORDER

14

RICK MALMENDIER, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
17
18

Defendants have requested an extension of time to file a response to plaintiff’s amended
complaint. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

19

1. Defendants’ request for an extension of time is granted;

20

2. Defendants need not file a response to plaintiff’s amended complaint until further

21

notice from the court;

22

3. Plaintiff shall file an opposition to defendants’ motion to revoke plaintiff’s IFP status

23

within 30 days. Failure to file an opposition within 30 days will result in a recommendation that

24

this action be dismissed without prejudice.

25

Dated: August 3, 2016

_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

26
27
28

1/howz1638.36(2)