Hammler v. Wright
Filing
153
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 7/11/19 DENYING 150 Motion for Reconsideration. (Kaminski, H)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ALLEN HAMMLER,
12
13
14
15
No. 2:15-cv-01645-TLN-EFB
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
J. WRIGHT,
Defendant.
16
17
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief
18
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On April 8, 2019, the Court denied Plaintiff’s motions for preliminary
19
injunctive relief seeking an order returning him to CSP-Sac (ECF No. 108) and for assistance in
20
obtaining and protecting his legal property (ECF Nos. 105, 112, and 117). Plaintiff moves for
21
reconsideration. (ECF No. 150.)
22
“Reconsideration is appropriate if the district court (1) is presented with newly discovered
23
evidence, (2) committed clear error or the initial decision was manifestly unjust, or (3) if there is
24
an intervening change in controlling law.” School Dist. No. 1J v. AC and S, Inc., 5 F.3d 1255,
25
1263 (9th Cir. 1993). Further, Local Rule 230(j) requires that a motion for reconsideration state
26
“what new or different facts or circumstances are claimed to exist which did not exist or were not
27
shown upon such prior motion, or what other grounds exist for the motion,” and “why the facts or
28
1
1
circumstances were not shown at the time of the prior motion.” E.D. Cal., Local Rule 230(j)(3)-
2
(4).
3
Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration fails to satisfy these standards. He argues that he
4
was denied the opportunity to respond to Defendants’ supplemental brief addressing whether he
5
was entitled to relief under the All Writs Act. (ECF No. 150.) The Court determined however,
6
that because the trial had been continued to January 2020, no court order was “necessary” for the
7
proper administration of justice, as required by the All Writs Act. (ECF No. 147.) The Court did
8
not need a response from Plaintiff to resolve Plaintiff’s motions.
9
10
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration (ECF
No. 150) is denied.
11
12
Dated: July 11, 2019
13
14
15
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?