Straits v. Rio Cosumnes Correctional Facility, et al.

Filing 10

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 5/9/2017 DISMISSING this action without prejudice. CASE CLOSED.(Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SCOT STRAITS, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 No. 2:15-cv-1668-EFB P v. ORDER RIO COSUMNES CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, et al., Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a former county inmate proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 18 19 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 20 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and is before the undersigned pursuant to plaintiff’s consent. See 28 U.S.C. 21 § 636; see also E.D. Cal. Local Rules, Appx. A, at (k)(4). On March 13, 2017, the court screened plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 22 23 § 1915A. The court dismissed plaintiff’s complaint, explained the deficiencies therein and 24 granted plaintiff thirty days in which file an amended complaint to cure the deficiencies. ECF 25 No. 7. The order warned plaintiff that failure to comply would result in this action being 26 dismissed for failure to state a claim. The time for acting has passed and plaintiff has not filed an 27 amended complaint, or otherwise responded to the court’s order. 28 ///// 1 1 A party’s failure to comply with any order or with the Local Rules “may be grounds for 2 imposition by the Court of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or within the 3 inherent power of the Court.” E.D. Cal. Local Rule 110. The court may dismiss an action with or 4 without prejudice, as appropriate, if a party disobeys an order or the Local Rules. See Ferdik v. 5 Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1263 (9th Cir. 1992) (district court did not abuse discretion in 6 dismissing pro se plaintiff’s complaint for failing to obey an order to re-file an amended 7 complaint to comply with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure); Carey v. King, 856 F.2d 1439, 8 1440-41 (9th Cir. 1988) (dismissal for pro se plaintiff’s failure to comply with local rule 9 regarding notice of change of address affirmed). 10 Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. 11 Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); E. D. Cal. Local Rule 110; 28 U.S.C. 1915A. 12 Dated: May 9, 2017. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?