Jackson v. Galang et al

Filing 81

ORDER adopting in full 59 Findings and Recommendations, signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 4/25/18. The motion to dismiss 33 filed by defendants Galang and Wolfson is GRANTED. The motion to dismiss 40 filed by the remaining defendants is DENIED in PART as to defendant Dator and GRANTED in PART as to all other defendants. This action shall proceed against defendant Dator only, who shall file an answer to the complaint within 30 days of the date of this order. (Kastilahn, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

CURTIS VAUGHN JACKSON, JR.,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 2:15-CV-1675-JAM-CMK-P

v.

ORDER

CARMELINO L. GALANG, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to

17
18

42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to

19

Eastern District of California local rules.
On September 7, 2017, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations

20
21

herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file

22

objections within a specified time. Timely objections to the findings and recommendations have

23

been filed.

24

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule

25

304(f), this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

26

entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by

27

proper analysis.

28

///
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

2

1.

The findings and recommendations filed September 7, 2017, are adopted in

2.

The motion to dismiss filed by defendants Galang and Wolfson (Doc. 33)

3.

The motion to dismiss filed by the remaining defendants (Doc. 40) is

3

full;

4
5
6
7
8
9

is granted;

denied in part as to defendant Dator and granted in part as to all other defendants; and
4.

This action shall proceed against defendant Dator only, who shall file an

answer to the complaint within 30 days of the date of this order.

10
11
12
13

DATED: April 25, 2018
/s/ John A. Mendez____________

_____

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2