Shoaf v. Ace Hardware Corporation
Filing
6
ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 9/28/2015 ORDERING that the 10/6/2015 deadline for counsel to conduct a Rule 26(f) Conference is continued. The Court shall set a new deadline for counsel to conduct a Rule 26(f) Conference at the 10/21/2015 hearing on Plaintiff's counsel's Motion to Withdraw as Counsel, or if no hearing is held, upon the Court's ruling on the Motion. (Zignago, K.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
Sami N. Khadder (SBN 232216)
KHADDER LAW FIRM
847 Sansome St., Suite 200
San Francisco, CA 94111
(Telephone) (415) 402-0711
(Facsimile) (415) 901-0402
sami@khadderlaw.com
Attorney for Plaintiff
MARCUS SHOAF
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
MARCUS SHOAF, an individual,
Case No.: 2:15−CV−01682−JAM−KJN
Plaintiff,
ORDER CONTINUING THE RULE
26(f) CONFERENCE OF COUNSEL
11
12
13
14
15
16
vs.
ACE HARDWARE CORPORATION, a
corporation; and DOES 1-40 inclusive,
Defendants
17
Complaint Filed: 06/22/2015
Assigned for all purposes to
Hon. John A. Mendez
18
19
20
21
The Court, having reviewing the Joint Stipulation to Continue the Rule 26(f)
Conference of Counsel, and good cause appearing therefore:
22
23
24
25
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
1. The October 6, 2015 deadline for counsel to conduct a Rule 26(f)
Conference is continued;
26
2. The Court shall set a new deadline for counsel to conduct a Rule 26(f)
27
Conference at the October 21, 2015 hearing on Plaintiff’s counsel’s
28
Shoaf v. Ace Hardware Corporation et al. (Case No. 2:15−CV−01682−JAM−KJN)
ORDER CONTINUING THE RULE 26(F) CONFERENCE OF COUNSEL
1
Motion to Withdraw as Counsel, or if no hearing is held, upon the
2
Court’s ruling on the Motion.
3
4
5
6
7
Dated: September 28, 2015
/s/ John A. Mendez
Hon. John A. Mendez
District Court Judge
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Shoaf v. Ace Hardware Corporation et al. (Case No. 2:15−CV−01682−JAM−KJN)
ORDER CONTINUING THE RULE 26(F) CONFERENCE OF COUNSEL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?