Shoaf v. Ace Hardware Corporation

Filing 6

ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 9/28/2015 ORDERING that the 10/6/2015 deadline for counsel to conduct a Rule 26(f) Conference is continued. The Court shall set a new deadline for counsel to conduct a Rule 26(f) Conference at the 10/21/2015 hearing on Plaintiff's counsel's Motion to Withdraw as Counsel, or if no hearing is held, upon the Court's ruling on the Motion. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 Sami N. Khadder (SBN 232216) KHADDER LAW FIRM 847 Sansome St., Suite 200 San Francisco, CA 94111 (Telephone) (415) 402-0711 (Facsimile) (415) 901-0402 sami@khadderlaw.com Attorney for Plaintiff MARCUS SHOAF 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 MARCUS SHOAF, an individual, Case No.: 2:15−CV−01682−JAM−KJN Plaintiff, ORDER CONTINUING THE RULE 26(f) CONFERENCE OF COUNSEL 11 12 13 14 15 16 vs. ACE HARDWARE CORPORATION, a corporation; and DOES 1-40 inclusive, Defendants 17 Complaint Filed: 06/22/2015 Assigned for all purposes to Hon. John A. Mendez 18 19 20 21 The Court, having reviewing the Joint Stipulation to Continue the Rule 26(f) Conference of Counsel, and good cause appearing therefore: 22 23 24 25 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The October 6, 2015 deadline for counsel to conduct a Rule 26(f) Conference is continued; 26 2. The Court shall set a new deadline for counsel to conduct a Rule 26(f) 27 Conference at the October 21, 2015 hearing on Plaintiff’s counsel’s 28 Shoaf v. Ace Hardware Corporation et al. (Case No. 2:15−CV−01682−JAM−KJN) ORDER CONTINUING THE RULE 26(F) CONFERENCE OF COUNSEL 1 Motion to Withdraw as Counsel, or if no hearing is held, upon the 2 Court’s ruling on the Motion. 3 4 5 6 7 Dated: September 28, 2015 /s/ John A. Mendez Hon. John A. Mendez District Court Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Shoaf v. Ace Hardware Corporation et al. (Case No. 2:15−CV−01682−JAM−KJN) ORDER CONTINUING THE RULE 26(F) CONFERENCE OF COUNSEL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?