Jackson v. Ponce

Filing 16

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 04/26/16 DISMISSING CASE pursuant to FRCP 41(a). CASE CLOSED. (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 HEATHER E. WILLIAMS, State Bar #122664 Federal Defender CAROLYN M. WIGGIN, Bar #182732 Assistant Federal Defender 801 I Street, 3rd Floor Sacramento, CA 95814 Tel: 916-498-5700/Fax 916-498-5710 carolyn_wiggin@fd.org Attorneys for Petitioner CLIFTON JAMES JACKSON 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CLIFTON JAMES JACKSON, Petitioner, 12 v. 13 14 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL; ORDER FELICIA PONCE, Warden, 15 No. Case No. 2:15-CV-01700 GGH Respondent. 16 17 Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Petitioner, 18 CLIFTON JAMES JACKSON, by and through his counsel Assistant Federal 19 Defender Carolyn M. Wiggin, hereby requests the voluntarily dismissal of Mr. 20 Jackson’s petition for writ of habeas, filed August 10, 2015. He respectfully 21 // 22 // 23 // 24 // 25 // 26 // 27 // 28 // 1 requests the Court issue order lodged herewith. 1 2 3 Dated: April 21, 2016 HEATHER E. WILLIAMS Federal Defender 4 5 6 /s/ Carolyn M. Wiggin CAROLYN M. WIGGIN Assistant Federal Defender 7 8 9 Attorney for Petitioner CLIFTON JAMES JACKSON 10 11 Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and good cause 12 13 14 15 16 appearing therefor, the petition for writ of habeas corpus, filed August 10, 2015 (ECF 1), is DISMISSED.1 Dated: April 26, 2016 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 17 18 19 /Jack1700.41 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 The parties have consented to the undersigned presiding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 636(c). Because respondent’s motion is neither an answer nor motion for summary judgment (a motion which goes to the merits of the action), this voluntary dismissal is appropriate pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1).. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?