Jackson v. Ponce

Filing 7

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 09/10/15 ORDERING that Respondent is directed to file an answer or a motion to dismiss within 60 days. If an answer is filed, respondent shall include with the answer any and all transcripts or other documents relevant to the determination of the issues presented in the application. Petitioner's traverse, if any, is due on or before 30 days from the date respondent's answer is filed; an opposition to a motion to dismiss is due within 30 days of service of the motion to dismiss. (Benson, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CLIFTON JAMES JACKSON, 12 No. 2:15-cv-1700 GGH P Petitioner, 13 v. 14 PONCE, Warden, 15 ORDER Respondent. 16 Petitioner has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 17 18 2241, and paid the requisite filing fee. Since petitioner may be entitled to the requested relief if 19 the claimed violation of constitutional rights is proved, respondent will be directed to file an 20 answer or a motion to dismiss. 21 In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 22 1. Respondent is directed to file an answer or a motion to dismiss within sixty (60) days 23 from the date of this order. If an answer is filed, respondent shall include with the answer any 24 and all transcripts or other documents relevant to the determination of the issues presented in the 25 application. 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 1 2. Petitioner’s traverse, if any, is due on or before thirty (30) days from the date 2 respondent’s answer is filed; an opposition to a motion to dismiss is due within thirty days of 3 service of the motion to dismiss. 4 Dated: September 10, 2015 5 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows 6 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 GGH17; jack1700.100 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?