Kimple v. Sacramento Police Department

Filing 6

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 8/21/15 DENYING 2 Motion to Proceed IFP; The Clerk of the Court shall provide plaintiff with another copy of the in forma pauperis application used by this court. Plaintiff shall submit, within 30 days from the date of this order, a fully completed in forma pauperis application, including a certified copy of his prison trust account statement for the six month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint.(Dillon, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

DEVELLE JAMES KIMPLE,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14
15

No. 2:15-cv-1703 DAD P

v.

ORDER

SACRAMENTO POLICE
DEPARTMENT,
Defendant.

16

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42

17
18

U.S.C. § 1983 together with a request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28

19

U.S.C. § 1915. However, the certificate portion of the request which must be completed by

20

plaintiff’s institution of incarceration has not been filled out. Also, plaintiff has not filed a

21

certified copy of his prison trust account statement for the six month period immediately

22

preceding the filing of the complaint. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). Plaintiff will be provided the

23

opportunity to submit a completed in forma pauperis application and a certified copy in support of

24

his application.

25

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

26

1. Plaintiff’s request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2) is denied
without prejudice.

27
28

/////
1

1
2

2. The Clerk of the Court shall provide plaintiff with another copy of the in forma
pauperis application used by this court.

3

3. Plaintiff shall submit, within thirty days from the date of this order, a fully completed

4

in forma pauperis application, including a certified copy of his prison trust account statement for

5

the six month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint. Plaintiff’s failure to

6

comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed without

7

prejudice.

8

Dated: August 21, 2015

9
10
11

DAD:10/md
kimp1703.3c+.new

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2