Mahon v. Roundpoint Mortgage Servicing Corporation et al

Filing 12

ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 10/16/2015 re 6 Defendants' MOTION to DISMISS : Plaintiff has failed to either respond to the motion or file a statement of non-opposition as required by the rules of this court. The hearing on the motion is therefore vacated, and counsel for plaintiff is ordered to show cause within 10 days from the date of this Order why this action should not be dismissed with prejudice for lack of prosecution. (Kirksey Smith, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 ----oo0oo---- 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 JUDITH MAHON, CIV. NO. 2:15-1724 WBS EFB Plaintiff, v. ROUNDPOINT MORTGAGE SERVICING CORPORATION; RBS FINANCIAL PRODUCTS, INC.; QUALITY LOAN SERVICE CORPORATION; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive and DOES 1-10 inclusive, Defendants. 20 21 ORDER ----oo0oo---Presently before the court is defendants’ motion to 22 dismiss plaintiff’s Complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 23 Procedure 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim on which relief 24 can be granted. 25 motion or file a statement of non-opposition as required by the 26 rules of this court. Plaintiff has failed to either respond to the 27 The hearing on the motion is therefore vacated, and 28 counsel for plaintiff is ordered to show cause within 10 days 1 1 from the date of this Order why this action should not be 2 dismissed with prejudice for lack of prosecution. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 16, 2015 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?