Bailey v. MacFarland et al

Filing 18

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 6/24/16: The deadline for Defendants to file their response to the Amended Complaint shall be extended from June 29, 2016 until and including July 22, 2016. (Kaminski, H)

KNOX, LEMMON & ANAPOLSKY, LLP
1 THOMAS S. KNOX (SBN 073384)
STEPHEN J. BYERS (SBN 245607)
2 300 Capitol Mall, Suite 1125
Sacramento, CA 95814
3 Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
4
Attorneys for Defendants MICHAEL J. MacFARLAND,
5 and THE PUBLIC GROUP, a Utah limited liability
company
6
7
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
TELE: [phone] FAX: [phone]

KNOX, LEMMON & ANAPOLSKY, LLP
300 CAPITOL MALL, SUITE 1125, SACRAMENTO, CA 95814

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
10
11 CHRISTINE L. BAILEY
12

Plaintiff,

13 v.
14 MICHAEL J. MacFARLAND,
and THE PUBLIC GROUP, a Utah
15 Limited Liability Company; and DOES 120, inclusive,
16
Defendants.
17
18
19

STIPULATION AND ORDER
EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO
RESPOND TO THE AMENDED COMPLAINT

Date action filed: August 13, 2015
Trial Date:
TBA

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS
TO RESPOND TO THE AMENDED COMPLAINT

20
21

CASE NO. 2:15-cv-01725-TLN-AC

On May 9, 2016, the Court issued its Order Granting Motion to Dismiss with Leave to Amend.

22
(Docket No. 14.)
23
24

On May 9, 2016, the Court also issued its Minute Order which states, in relevant part, that

25 “Plaintiff is hereby granted thirty (30) days from the entry of this order to file an Amended Complaint.
26
27
28

1

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS
TO RESPOND TO THE AMENDED COMPLAINT

1

Defendants Answer shall be due within twenty-one (21) days of the filing of the Amended Complaint.”

2 (Docket No. 15.)
On June 8, 2016, Plaintiff filed her Amended Complaint. (Docket No. 16.)

4

The Eastern District’s Local Rule 144(a) provides, in relevant part, that all extensions of time

5 (beyond an initial stipulation extending time to respond to the complaint) “must be approved by the
6
Court.”
7
Pursuant to Local Rule 144(a), the parties, by and through their attorneys of record, hereby
8
stipulate that the deadline for Defendants MICHAEL J. MACFARLAND and THE PUBLIC GROUP,
9
TELE: [phone] FAX: [phone]

KNOX, LEMMON & ANAPOLSKY, LLP
300 CAPITOL MALL, SUITE 1125, SACRAMENTO, CA 95814

3

10 LLC, a Utah limited liability company, to file their response to the Amended Complaint whether by
11 means of an Answer, a Motion under Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or other
12 appropriate motion, will be extended from June 29, 2016 until and including July 22, 2016.
13
14
15 Dated: June 21, 2016

KNOX, LEMMON & ANAPOLSKY, LLP

16
17

By: /s/

18

STEPHEN J. BYERS, Attorneys for
MICHAEL J. MACFARLAND and THE PUBLIC
GROUP, LLC

19
20
21
22 Dated: June 21, 2016
23
24

CAROLE M. POPE, a Professional Corporation
By: /s/ (as authorized on 6/21/16)
CAROLE M. POPE, Attorney for
CHRISTINE L. BAILEY

25
26
27
28

2

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS
TO RESPOND TO THE AMENDED COMPLAINT

ORDER

1
2

Having reviewed the parties’ Stipulation Extending Time for Defendants to Respond to the

3 Amended Complaint, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the deadline for
4

Defendants to file their response to the Amended Complaint whether by means of an Answer, a Motion

5
under Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or other appropriate motion, will be extended
6
7

IT IS SO ORDERED:

9
TELE: [phone] FAX: [phone]

KNOX, LEMMON & ANAPOLSKY, LLP
300 CAPITOL MALL, SUITE 1125, SACRAMENTO, CA 95814

8

from June 29, 2016 until and including July 22, 2016.

10 Dated: June 24, 2016
11
12
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

3

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS
TO RESPOND TO THE AMENDED COMPLAINT