Martinelli v. Johnson & Johnson et al

Filing 246

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 9/21/2020 ORDERING the Declaration of Larry Martinelli in Support of Motion to Quash Subpoena (Dkt. 225 at 21-22) shall be admissible in this case for all purposes, including at trial. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP Richard B. Goetz (State Bar No. 115666) Carlos M. Lazatin (State Bar No. 229650) 400 South Hope Street Los Angeles, CA 90071 Telephone: (213) 430-6000 Facsimile: (213) 430-6407 Email: rgoetz@omm.com clazatin@omm.com BURSOR & FISHER, P.A. Neal J. Deckant (State Bar. No. 322946) Frederick J. Klorczyk (State Bar No. 320783) 1990 North California Boulevard, Suite 940 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 Telephone: (925) 300-4455 Facsimile: (925) 407-2700 E-Mail: ndeckant@bursor.com fklorczyk@bursor.com O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP Hannah Y. Chanoine (admitted pro hac vice) Times Square Tower 7 Times Square New York, NY 10036 Telephone: (212) 326-2000 Facsimile: (212) 326-2061 Email: hchanoine@omm.com BURSOR & FISHER, P.A. Joseph I. Marchese (admitted pro hac vice) 888 Seventh Avenue New York, NY 10019 Telephone: (646) 837-7150 Facsimile: (212) 989-9163 E-Mail: jmarchese@bursor.com 10 13 BURSOR & FISHER, P.A. Scott A. Bursor (State Bar No. 276006) 2665 S. Bayshore Dr., Suite 220 Miami, FL 33133-5402 Telephone: (305) 330-5512 Facsimile: (305) 676-9006 E-Mail: scott@bursor.com 14 Attorneys for Plaintiff Attorneys for Defendants 11 12 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 18 JOANN MARTINELLI, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 19 20 21 22 23 Plaintiff, v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON and McNEIL NUTRITIONALS, LLC, Defendants. 24 25 26 27 28 JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING ADMISSIBILITY Case No. 2:15-cv-01733-MCE-DB No. 2:15-cv-01733-MCE-DB JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING ADMISSIBILITY OF DECLARATION OF LARRY MARTINELLI 1 In the interests of efficiently conducting discovery, Plaintiff Joann Martinelli (“Plaintiff”), 2 Defendants Johnson & Johnson and McNeil Nutritionals, LLC (“Defendants”), and third-party 3 Larry Martinelli (collectively, the “Parties”) submit this joint stipulation regarding the 4 admissibility of the Declaration of Larry Martinelli in Support of Motion to Quash Subpoena, 5 dated March 24, 2020 (the “Declaration”), Dkt. 225 at 21–22. In lieu of taking Larry Martinelli’s 6 deposition, the Parties agree that the Declaration will be admissible in this case for all purposes, 7 including at trial. Accordingly, by and through their counsel of record, the Parties hereby 8 stipulate as follows: 9 WHEREAS, on March 10, 2020, third-party Larry Martinelli moved to quash a subpoena 10 for his deposition testimony (Dkt. 220), and on March 24, 2020, filed the Declaration in support 11 of his portion of the Joint Statement regarding the motion to quash (Dkt. 225); 12 13 14 15 16 WHEREAS, on June 8, 2020, Magistrate Judge Barnes denied Larry Martinelli’s motion to quash (Dkt. 236); WHEREAS, on September 2, 2020 Defendants served a subpoena for Larry Martinelli’s deposition testimony, noticing the deposition to take place on September 16, 2020; WHEREAS, Defendants have agreed to withdraw their subpoena to Larry Martinelli, and 17 in exchange, the Parties hereby stipulate that the Declaration shall be admissible in this case for 18 all purposes, including at trial. 19 NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties STIPULATE AND AGREE, subject to the approval of 20 this Court, that: 21 1. The Declaration of Larry Martinelli in Support of Motion to Quash Subpoena, 22 dated March 24, 2020 (Dkt. 225 at 21–22) shall be admissible in this case for all purposes, 23 including at trial; and 24 2. Defendants will not seek to depose Larry Martinelli for any purpose in this case 25 except in the event that Larry Martinelli submits evidence that contradicts or is inconsistent with 26 the statements in the Declaration of Larry Martinelli in Support of Motion to Quash Subpoena, 27 dated March 24, 2020 (Dkt. 225 at 21–22). 28 JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING ADMISSIBILITY Case No. 2:15-cv-01733-MCE-DB -1- 1 2 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 3 4 Dated: September 15, 2020 O’MELVENY & MYERS, LLP By: _/s/ Carlos M. Lazatin __ Carlos M. Lazatin 5 6 Richard B. Goetz (State Bar No. 115666) Carlos M. Lazatin (State Bar No. 229650) 400 South Hope Street Los Angeles, California 90071 Telephone: (213) 430-6000 Facsimile: (213) 430-6407 E-Mail: rgoetz@omm.com clazatin@omm.com 7 8 9 10 11 Attorneys for Defendants 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Dated: September 15, 2020 BURSOR & FISHER, P.A. By: /s/ Frederick J. Klorczyk III (as authorized on 9/15/20) Frederick J. Klorczyk III 23 Neal J. Deckant (State Bar No. 322946) Frederick J. Klorczyk III (State Bar No. 320783) 1990 North California Boulevard, Suite 940 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 Telephone: (925) 300-4455 Facsimile: (925) 407-2700 E-Mail: ndeckant@bursor.com fklorczyk@bursor.com 24 Attorneys for Plaintiff 19 20 21 22 25 26 27 28 JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING ADMISSIBILITY Case No. 2:15-cv-01733-MCE-DB -2- 1 2 3 4 Dated: September 15, 2020 BURSOR & FISHER, P.A. By: /s/ Frederick J. Klorczyk III (as authorized on 9/15/20) Frederick J. Klorczyk III 5 6 7 8 9 10 Neal J. Deckant (State Bar No. 322946) Frederick J. Klorczyk III (State Bar No. 320783) 1990 North California Boulevard, Suite 940 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 Telephone: (925) 300-4455 Facsimile: (925) 407-2700 E-Mail: ndeckant@bursor.com fklorczyk@bursor.com Attorneys for Larry Martinelli 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING ADMISSIBILITY Case No. 2:15-cv-01733-MCE-DB -3- 1 2 3 ORDER Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED DATED: September 21, 2020 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING ADMISSIBILITY Case No. 2:15-cv-01733-MCE-DB /s/ DEBORAH BARNES UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?