Jackson v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
11
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 2/4/16 ORDERING plaintiff's is granted a 30-day extension of time to 3/7/16, to file her Opening Brief, in accordance with the Court's Scheduling Order. (Becknal, R)
1
2
3
4
JACQUELINE A. FORSLUND
CSBN 154575
P.O. Box 4476
Sunriver, OR 97707
Telephone:
Email:
541-419-0074
jaf@forslundlaw.com
5
6
Attorney for Plaintiff
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
TERESA L. JACKSON,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
)
v.
)
)
CAROLYN W. COLVIN,
)
Acting Comm’r of Social Security,
)
)
Defendant,
)
)
____________________________________)
Case No. 2:15-cv-01737-AC
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED
ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
TO FILE OPENING BRIEF
17
18
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties, through their undersigned attorneys, to extend
19
the time 30 days to March 7, 2016, for Plaintiff to file her Opening Brief, in accordance with the
20
Court’s Scheduling Order. This is Plaintiff’s first request for an extension, which is requested
21
because Plaintiff’s counsel is experiencing a backload in her workload.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Jackson v. Colvin
Stipulation and Proposed Order
E.D. Cal. 2:15-cv-01737-AC
1
The parties further stipulate that the Court’s Scheduling Order be modified accordingly.
2
3
Respectfully submitted,
4
5
6
Date: January 29, 2016
JACQUELINE A. FORSLUND
Attorney at Law
7
8
/s/Jacqueline A. Forslund
JACQUELINE A. FORSLUND
9
Attorney for Plaintiff
10
11
12
Date: January 29, 2016
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
DEBORAH STACHEL
Acting Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX
Social Security Administration
13
14
15
/s/*Marla Letellier
MARLA LETELLIER
Special Assistant United States Attorney
*By email authorization
16
17
18
Attorney for Defendant
19
20
ORDER
21
22
APPROVED AND SO ORDERED
23
24
DATED: February 4, 2016
25
26
27
28
Jackson v. Colvin
Stipulation and Proposed Order
E.D. Cal. 2:15-cv-01737-AC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?