Terhune v. Lizarraga et al

Filing 22

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 5/2/16 ORDERING that Defendant's motion to modify the scheduling order in this case (ECF No. 21 ) is GRANTED; The parties shall complete discovery on or before September 1, 2016. Any mot ions necessary to compel discovery shall be filed by that date; The parties shall file all pretrial motions on or before November 19, 2016. Except as stated in this order, the courts February 5, 2016, scheduling order remains in effect. (Dillon, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CAMERON R. TERHUNE, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:15-cv-1738 TLN KJN P (TEMP) v. ORDER JOE LIZARRAGA, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Defendant Pace has filed a motion to modify the scheduling order in this case to allow 17 18 him additional time to conduct discovery and file a motion for summary judgment. 19 Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 20 1. Defendant’s motion to modify the scheduling order in this case (ECF No. 21) is 21 granted; 2. The parties shall complete discovery on or before September 1, 2016. Any motions 22 23 necessary to compel discovery shall be filed by that date; 24 3. The parties shall file all pretrial motions on or before November 19, 2016. Motions 25 shall be briefed in accordance with paragraph 8 of this court’s order filed November 12, 2015; 26 and 27 ///// 28 ///// 1 4. Except as stated in this order, the court’s February 5, 2016, scheduling order remains in 1 2 effect. 3 Dated: May 2, 2016 4 5 6 7 terh1738.41mod 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?