Jardine v. Unknown

Filing 62

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 11/16/18 VACATING the hearing scheduled for 12/12/18 on 52 Motion for Summary Judgment; the motion will be decided on the papers. Plaintiff shall file and serve his opposition to defendant's motion for summary judgment by 11/30/18; no further extensions of time will be granted. Defendant may file and serve a reply no later than 12/14/18.(Coll, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DALE JARDINE, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:15-cv-1749 MCE AC P v. ORDER DR. JACK ST. CLAIR, 15 Defendant. 16 Plaintiff is a former state prisoner proceeding pro se with this civil rights action against 17 18 sole defendant Dr. St. Clair. Plaintiff again requests extensions of time to submit his opposition 19 to defendant’s pending motion for summary judgment, which is currently scheduled for hearing 20 on December 12, 2018. This order provides plaintiff an additional – and final – two weeks to file 21 and serve his opposition to defendant’s motion. This extension of time means that plaintiff has 22 been provided a total of 90 days to respond to defendant’s motion, far longer than the 21-day 23 period accorded by the Local Rules. This order also vacates the hearing on defendant’s motion, 24 which will be decided on the papers. Failure of plaintiff to timely file an opposition will result in a recommendation for 25 26 dismissal of this action without prejudice. No further extensions of time or other 27 accommodations will be granted in this case. 28 //// 1 1 Plaintiff is again informed of the following requirements for opposing a motion for 2 summary judgment. See ECF No. 23 at 6; see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 56; Local Rule 260; Rand v. 3 Rowland, 154 F.3d 952, 957 (9th Cir. 1998); Woods v. Carey, 684 F.3d 934 (9th Cir. 2012). 4 A motion for summary judgment is premised on the argument that a case presents no 5 significant factual disputes and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. To 6 oppose a motion for summary judgment, you must address each of the facts listed in the 7 defendant’s Statement of Undisputed Facts – you must admit the facts that are undisputed, and 8 deny the facts that are disputed. If you fail to contradict defendant’s facts and evidence with your 9 own facts and evidence, the court may accept defendant’s presentation of the case and grant the 10 motion. 11 To deny a fact proffered by defendant, you must cite to the evidence you rely on to 12 support your denial. To do this, you may refer to specific statements made in your complaint if 13 you signed your complaint under penalty of perjury and your complaint shows that you have 14 personal knowledge of the matters stated. You may also submit declarations setting forth the 15 facts that you believe prove your claims, provided the person who signs the declaration has 16 personal knowledge of the facts stated. You may also submit all or part of deposition transcripts, 17 answers to interrogatories, admissions, and other authenticated documents. 18 Subject to these considerations, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 19 1. The hearing scheduled for December 12, 2018 on defendant’s motion for summary 20 judgment is VACATED; the motion will be decided on the papers. 21 2. Plaintiff shall file and serve his opposition to defendant’s motion for summary 22 judgment on or before November 30, 2018; no further extensions of time will be granted. 23 3. Defendant may file and serve a reply no later than December 14, 2018. 24 //// 25 //// 26 //// 27 //// 28 //// 2 1 4. Failure of plaintiff to timely file his opposition to defendant’s motion for summary 2 judgment shall result in a recommendation to the district judge that this action be dismissed 3 without prejudice. 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 DATED: November 16, 2018 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?