Viramontes, et al v. Pfizer Inc.
Filing
91
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 11/17/2017 AMENDING the 82 Scheduling Order as follows: Disclosure of experts due by 1/24/2018; Disclosure of rebuttal experts due by 2/14/2018; Last discovery motions heard by 3/7/2018; Discovery completed by 3/21/2018; Last law and motion filed 3/9/2018; Last law and motion heard by 6/6/2018; Mid-litigation statement due by 3/7/2018; Joint pretrial statement due by 7/17/2018; Final Pretrial Conference set for 8/23/2018 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2 (TLN) before District Judge Troy L. Nunley; Jury Trial set for 10/22/2018 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 2 (TLN) before District Judge Troy L. Nunley. (Hunt, G)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
EDWARD G. VIRAMONTES,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:15-cv-01754-TLN-AC
v.
ORDER
PFIZER INC.,
15
Defendant.
16
17
This matter is before the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). On
18
November 17, 2017, at 3:00 p.m. the parties participated in an informal telephonic discovery
19
conference with the undersigned. Following discussion with the parties, the court determined that
20
it was appropriate to issue a new schedule in this case in order to accommodate rescheduled
21
depositions. The scheduling order previously issued in this case, ECF No. 82, is accordingly
22
amended as follows:
23
Disclosure of experts:
January 24, 2018
24
Disclosure of rebuttal experts:
February 14, 2018
25
Last discovery motions heard:
March 7, 2018
26
Discovery completed:
March 21, 2018
27
Last law and motion filed:
May 9, 2018
28
Last law and motion heard:
June 6, 2018
1
1
Mid-litigation statement:
March 7, 2018
2
Joint pretrial statement:
July 17, 2018
3
Final pretrial conference:
August 23, 2018 at 2:00 p.m.
4
Trial:
October 22, 2018 at 9:00 a.m.
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: November 17, 2017.
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?