Fagan v. County of Sacramento

Filing 43

AMENDED STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 4/13/17. Plaintiff is GRANTED leave to file the Third Amended Complaint, which is to be filed with the Court within ten (10) days of this signed Order.(Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 4 GREGORY M. FINCH (SBN 091237) SIGNATURE LAW GROUP, LLP 3400 Bradshaw Rd., Suite A-4A Sacramento, California 95827 Telephone: (916) 856-5800 Facsimile: (916) 880-5255 gfinch@signaturelawgroup.com 5 Attorney for Plaintiff JORDAN FAGAN 2 3 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 14 15 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) JORDAN FAGAN vs. AIMEE EAGLETON, MICHAEL MATRANGA, JOHN DOE; and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, 16 Defendants. 17 Case No. 2:15-cv-01755-JAM-KJN AMENDED STIPULATION AND ORDER GRANTING LEAVE FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT Action Filed: August 18, 2015 18 Plaintiff, JORDAN FAGAN (“Plaintiff”) by and through GREGORY M. FINCH of 19 Signature Law Group, LLP, his attorney of record; defendant AIMEE EAGLETON by and 20 through WENDY MOTOOKA of Cregger & Chalfant, LLP, her attorneys of record; and 21 22 23 MICHAEL MATRANGA by and through JONATHAN B. PAUL of Rivera & Associates, his attorneys of record, submit the following Joint Stipulation and request that the Court grant 24 Plaintiff leave to file a Amended Complaint pursuant to Rule 15(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil 25 Procedure: 26 1. Plaintiff filed his complaint on August 18, 2015. 27 28 1 AMENDED STIPULATION AND ORDER GRANTING LEAVE FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT 1 2. Following the Court’s granting of Defendant’s County of Sacramento Motion to Dismiss, 2 Plaintiff filed his First Amended Complaint on January 13, 2016. 3 3. Following the Court’s granting of Defendant’s County of Sacramento second Motion to 4 5 6 7 8 Dismiss, Plaintiff filed his Second Amended Complaint on June 21, 2016. 4. Defendant AIMEE EAGLETON filed her answer to the Second Amended Complaint on July 26, 2016. 5. Defendant MICHAEL MATRANGA filed his answer to the Second Amended Complaint 9 on July 27, 2016. 10 11 12 13 14 15 6. While in the course of discovery, Plaintiff has determined that Defendant AIMEE EAGLETON appears not be responsible for the injuries suffered by Plaintiff. 7. Plaintiff seeks to amend his Complaint by dismissing Defendant AIMEE EAGLETON and limit all causes of action to Defendant MICHAEL MATRANGA. A Third Amended Complaint that includes this amendment is attached as Exhibit A. 16 17 8. The parties have met and conferred regarding the elimination of AIMEE EAGLETON as 18 a defendant in Plaintiff’s proposed Third Amended Complaint and Defendants have 19 agreed to Plaintiff’s request for this stipulation. 20 21 NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby stipulate and request that the Court grant Plaintiff leave to file a Third Amended Complaint in this action, a true and correct copy of which is 22 23 attached hereto as Exhibit A. 24 25 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 26 27 28 2 AMENDED STIPULATION AND ORDER GRANTING LEAVE FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT 1 2 3 4 Dated: April 12, 2017 RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, SIGNATURE LAW GROUP, LLP 5 6 BY: 7 8 /s/ Gregory M. Finch GREGORY M. FINCH Attorney for Plaintiff, JORDAN FAGAN 9 10 Dated: April 12, 2017 CREGGER & CHALFANT LLP 11 BY: 12 13 14 15 Dated: April 12, 2017 /s/ Wendy Motooka ______ WENDY MOTOOKA Attorney for Defendant AIMEE EAGLETON RIVERA & ASSOCIATES 16 17 BY: 18 19 /s/ Jonathan B. Paul JONATHAN B. PAUL Attorney for Defendant MICHAEL MATRANGA 20 ORDER 21 22 23 24 Good cause appearing, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff is granted leave to file the Third Amended Complaint, which is to be filed with the Court within ten (10) days of this signed Order. 25 27 /s/ John A. Mendez________________________ HON. JOHN A. MENDEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 28 3 26 Dated: 4/13/2017 AMENDED STIPULATION AND ORDER GRANTING LEAVE FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?