Lopez v. People of the State of California

Filing 23

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 1/15/16 ORDERING that petitioners request (ECF No. 22 ) is GRANTED and he has 60 days from the date this order is served to file his traverse, if any. As the filing of the traverse is optional, the matter stands submitted for decision at the expiration of the 60 days.(Dillon, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

JESUS ANDRES LOPEZ,

12

Petitioner,

13
14
15

No. 2:15-cv-1756-EFB P

v.

ORDER

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA,
Respondent.

16
17
18

Petitioner is a state prisoner without counsel seeking a writ of habeas corpus. See 28

19

U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner has requested a third extension of time to file his traverse and has

20

requested the court provide him with guidance on how to file a traverse. While the court cannot

21

provide petitioner with legal advice nor are there any standard pleading forms for a traverse, his

22

request for a final extension of time is granted.
Good cause appearing, it is ORDERED that petitioner’s request (ECF No. 22) is granted

23
24

and he has 60 days from the date this order is served to file his traverse, if any. As the filing of

25

the traverse is optional, the matter stands submitted for decision at the expiration of the sixty

26

days.

27

DATED: January 15, 2016.

28