Rice v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 16

STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 3/27/2017 AWARDING the plaintiff attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), in the amount of $4,500.00 and costs under 28 U.S.C. § 1920, in the amount of $400.00. (Michel, G.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 Shanny J. Lee, Calif. Bar No. 213599 Law Office of Charles E. Binder And Harry J. Binder, LLP 485 Madison Avenue, Suite 501 New York, NY 10022 (212)-677-6801 Fax (646)-273-2196 Shanny.lee@binderlawfirm.com 6 7 Attorneys for Plaintiff 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 MARSHA D. RICE, Plaintiff, 12 13 14 15 v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, 16 17 Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 2:15-cv-1763-DB STIPULATION AND ORDER AWARDING ATTORNEY FEES UNDER THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), AND COSTS, PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1920 18 19 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their 20 undersigned counsel, subject to the approval of the Court, that Plaintiff be awarded 21 attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), 22 in the amount of FOUR THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($4,500.00), 23 and costs under 28 U.S.C. § 1920, in the amount of FOUR HUNDRED 24 DOLLARS ($400.00). This amount represents compensation for all legal services 25 rendered on behalf of Plaintiff by counsel in connection with this civil action, in 26 accordance with 28 U.S.C. §§ 2412(d), 1920. 27 28 After the Court issues an order for EAJA fees and expenses to Plaintiff, the government will consider the matter of Plaintiff's assignment of EAJA fees and 1 1 expenses to Plaintiff's attorney. Pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521 2 (2010), the ability to honor the assignment will depend on whether the fees and 3 expenses are subject to any offset allowed under the United States Department of 4 the Treasury's Offset Program. After the order for EAJA fees and expenses is 5 entered, the government will determine whether they are subject to any offset. 6 Fees and expenses shall be made payable to Plaintiff, but if the Department 7 of the Treasury determines that Plaintiff does not owe a federal debt, then the 8 government shall cause the payment of fees and expenses to be made directly to 9 Plaintiff’s counsel, pursuant to the assignment executed by Plaintiff. Any 10 payments made shall be delivered to Plaintiff's counsel. A true and correct copy of 11 the Retainer Agreement and Assignment is attached hereto as Exhibit “A.” 12 This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Plaintiff's request for 13 EAJA attorney fees and expenses, and does not constitute an admission of liability 14 on the part of Defendant under the EAJA. Payment of the agreed amount shall 15 constitute a complete release from, and bar to, any and all claims that Plaintiff 16 and/or Plaintiff's counsel may have relating to EAJA attorney fees and expenses in 17 connection with this action. 18 This award is without prejudice to the rights of Plaintiff's counsel to seek 19 Social Security Act attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), subject to the 20 provisions of the EAJA. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Respectfully submitted, 1 2 Dated: March 16, 2017 LAW OFFICE OF CHARLES E. BINDER AND HARRY J. BINDER, LLC 3 4 By: 5 /s/ Shanny J. Lee Shanny J. Lee Attorney for Plaintiff 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Dated: March 16, 2017 By: /s/ Francesco Paulo Benavides Francesco Paulo Benavides Special Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for Defendant 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 1 ORDER 2 Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation (ECF No. 15) IT IS SO ORDERED. 3 4 Dated: March 27, 2017 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 DLB:6 DB\orders\orders.soc sec\rice1763.stip.eaja.ord 24 25 26 27 28 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?