Carter v. Solano County Detention Facility et al
Filing
7
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 2/04/16 ordering that this action is dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. CASE CLOSED. (Plummer, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DANIEL MAURICE CARTER,
12
13
14
15
No. 2:15-cv-1794-EFB P (TEMP)
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
SOLANO COUNTY DETENTION
FACILITY, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
A recent court order was served on plaintiff’s address of record and returned by the postal
18
service. It appears that plaintiff has failed to comply with Local Rule 183(b), which requires that
19
a party appearing in propria persona inform the court of any address change. More than sixty-
20
three days have passed since the court order was returned by the postal service and plaintiff has
21
failed to notify the Court of a current address.
22
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice
23
for failure to prosecute. See Local Rule 183(b).1
24
DATED: February 4, 2016.
25
26
27
28
1
Plaintiff has consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 636. (Doc. No. 5)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?